ArticleScientific reports2025
Trunk stability and breathing exercises superior to foam rolling for restoring postural stability after core muscle fatigue in sedentary employees.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Effects of post-exercise stretching versus no stretching on lower limb muscle recovery and performance: a meta-analysis.Frontiers in physiology · 2025Pooled it
- Unstable trunk core strength training improves shooting performance and holding stability in elite 10 m air pistol athletes: a pilot randomized controlled trial.Scientific reports · 2026Trial
- Acute effects of foam rolling versus passive rest following a single bout of explosive squat jump exercise.Scientific reports · 2026Trial
- Inspiratory muscle training and trunk control exercises on respiratory strength and motor function in spinal muscular atrophy: randomized controlled trial.Scientific reports · 2025Trial
- Effects of Supervised Physiotherapy-Based Exercise on Ovarian Reserve and Spontaneous Pregnancy in Women with Diminished Ovarian Reserve: A Controlled Pilot Study.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- The role and application prospects of plant-derived bioactive peptides in exercise fatigue recovery.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study compares the magnitude and speed of restoring fatigue-impaired postural stability following passive and active recovery modalities, including diaphragmatic breathing, trunk stability exercises, and foam rolling, among sedentary employees. Eighteen sedentary adults (aged 36.2 ± 8.1 years) volunteered for this study. They performed a modified Abt's fatigue protocol involving 8 exercises specifically targeting their core muscles. Immediately following the fatiguing intervention, they underwent three active recovery modalities (diaphragmatic breathing, trunk stability, and foam rolling exercises), and one passive recovery (lying on the bed), each separated by a week. Postural stability and muscle activity were assessed pre-fatigue, post-fatigue, immediately, and 15 min post-recovery. After core muscle fatigue, center of pressure (CoP) velocity significantly increased in both stable and unstable conditions. Restoration of CoP velocity was most effective following trunk stability exercises, followed by diaphragmatic breathing, foam rolling, and passive recovery. Similarly, CoP displacement increased post-fatigue, with trunk stability exercises and diaphragmatic breathing showing the greatest effectiveness in restoring its values to pre-fatigue levels. After 15 minutes of recovery, no significant changes were observed in CoP velocity and displacement in either condition. These findings suggest that trunk stability exercises and diaphragmatic breathing rapidly restore postural stability after fatigue in sedentary adults, outperforming foam rolling and passive recovery.Trial registration: IRCT20221126056606N1. Date of registration: December 25, 2022.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.