Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40263348›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Ensemble learning with explainable AI for improved heart disease prediction based on multiple datasets.

Shahid Mohammad Ganie, Pijush Kanti Dutta Pramanik, Zhongming Zhao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Shahid Mohammad Ganie *AI Research Centre, Department of Analytics, Woxsen University, Hyderabad, Telangana, 502345, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9925-0402
Pijush Kanti Dutta Pramanik *School of Computer Science and Engineering, Galgotias University, Greater Noida, Uttar Pradesh, 203201, India. pijushjld@yahoo.co.in.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9438-9309
Zhongming ZhaoCenter for Precision Health, School of Biomedical Informatics, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, 77030, USA. zhongming.zhao@uth.tmc.edu.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3477-0914

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Heart disease is one of the leading causes of death worldwide. Predicting and detecting heart disease early is crucial, as it allows medical professionals to take appropriate and necessary actions at earlier stages. Healthcare professionals can diagnose cardiac conditions more accurately by applying machine learning technology. This study aimed to enhance heart disease prediction using stacking and voting ensemble methods. Fifteen base models were trained on two different heart disease datasets. After evaluating various combinations, six base models were pipelined to develop ensemble models employing a meta-model (stacking) and a majority vote (voting). The performance of the stacking and voting models was compared to that of the individual base models. To ensure the robustness of the performance evaluation, we conducted a statistical analysis using the Friedman aligned ranks test and Holm post-hoc pairwise comparisons. The results indicated that the developed ensemble models, particularly stacking, consistently outperformed the other models, achieving higher accuracy and improved predictive outcomes. This rigorous statistical validation emphasised the reliability of the proposed methods. Furthermore, we incorporated explainable AI (XAI) through SHAP analysis to interpret the model predictions, providing transparency and insight into how individual features influence heart disease prediction. These findings suggest that combining the predictions of multiple models through stacking or voting may enhance the performance of heart disease prediction and serve as a valuable tool in clinical decision-making.

Indexed as

Heart DiseasesMachine LearningEnsemble LearningHumansEnsemble learningExplainable AIHeart disease predictionSHAPStackingVoting

Identifiers

PMID40263348
PMCPMC12015489

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.