ArticleScientific reports2025
Ensemble learning with explainable AI for improved heart disease prediction based on multiple datasets.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Role prompting modulates linguistic style but not clinical decision structure in GPT-5 tumour board simulation.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- Heterogeneous Multilayer Nanopores via Chemically Tuned Dielectric Breakdown for Single-Molecule Sensing.Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2026Article
- Predicting short birth intervals in Bangladesh using stacked machine learning and SHAP explainability: evidence from BDHS 2022.Reproductive health · 2026Article
- Leakage-Safe Precision-Aware Dual-Branch FT-Transformer for Population-Scale Heart Disease Risk Prediction.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- UbiQTree: Uncertainty quantification in XAI with tree ensembles.Patterns (New York, N.Y.) · 2026Article
- Lung cancer risk prediction using interpretable ensemble models on lifestyle and clinical data.PloS one · 2026Article
- Interpretable machine learning for multiclass trajectory prediction in cardiovascular-kidney-metabolic syndrome stage: development and external validation.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Article
- Evaluation of coronary heart disease risk prediction based on simple physical examination parameters by machine learning model: a retrospective cohort model development and validation study.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
- Leveraging Clinical Data for Early Heart Disease Prediction: A Machine Learning Approach With Interpretability Analysis.Biomedical engineering and computational biology · 2026Article
- Interpretable ensemble learning for tumor-type prediction with a SHAP-based evaluation of CatBoost and voting classifiers.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Lifestyle data-based multiclass obesity prediction with interpretable ensemble models incorporating SHAP and LIME analysis.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Enhanced and Interpretable Prediction of Multiple Cancer Types Using a Stacking Ensemble Approach with SHAP Analysis.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Heart disease is one of the leading causes of death worldwide. Predicting and detecting heart disease early is crucial, as it allows medical professionals to take appropriate and necessary actions at earlier stages. Healthcare professionals can diagnose cardiac conditions more accurately by applying machine learning technology. This study aimed to enhance heart disease prediction using stacking and voting ensemble methods. Fifteen base models were trained on two different heart disease datasets. After evaluating various combinations, six base models were pipelined to develop ensemble models employing a meta-model (stacking) and a majority vote (voting). The performance of the stacking and voting models was compared to that of the individual base models. To ensure the robustness of the performance evaluation, we conducted a statistical analysis using the Friedman aligned ranks test and Holm post-hoc pairwise comparisons. The results indicated that the developed ensemble models, particularly stacking, consistently outperformed the other models, achieving higher accuracy and improved predictive outcomes. This rigorous statistical validation emphasised the reliability of the proposed methods. Furthermore, we incorporated explainable AI (XAI) through SHAP analysis to interpret the model predictions, providing transparency and insight into how individual features influence heart disease prediction. These findings suggest that combining the predictions of multiple models through stacking or voting may enhance the performance of heart disease prediction and serve as a valuable tool in clinical decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.