Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40263325›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Machine learning modeling and multi objective optimization of artificial detrusor.

Yin Mao, Li Xiao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Yin MaoSchool of Electromechanical Engineering, Guangdong University of Technology, Guangzhou, 510006, China.
Li XiaoSchool of Electromechanical Engineering, Guangdong University of Technology, Guangzhou, 510006, China. lixiao@gdut.edu.cn.

Funding

the Guangzhou Scientific Research Plan 201904010184the National Natural Science Foundation of China 52075101the Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province 2017A030313265
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To address the problem of obtaining optimal design parameters for existing artificial detrusors using single-objective optimization methods, this research proposed a machine learning-based artificial detrusor modeling and multi-objective optimization approach, which includes a thorough process from modeling to optimization. Extreme learning machine was used to model artificial detrusors in the suggested approach, and in order to increase modeling accuracy, a multi-strategy modified crayfish optimization algorithm for tuning the extreme learning machine's parameters was put forth in this research. The multi-objective grey wolf optimization algorithm was utilized to optimize the artificial detrusor based on the model. In order to validate the suggested approach, an artificial detrusor driven by a shape memory spring was finally built as an experimental platform. The results show that the improved crayfish optimization algorithm proposed in this paper can effectively avoid the defects of the original algorithm, and its optimization performance and convergence ability are better than the comparison algorithm. With a root mean square error of 1.51E-02, a coefficient of determination of 9.81E-01, a mean absolute error of 1.32E-02, and a mean absolute percentage error of 1.66E-01, the established artificial detrusor model predicts the shape memory spring-driven artificial detrusor's emptying rate. It also predicts the temperature increment with a root mean square error of 8.47E-01, a coefficient of determination of 9.81E-01, a mean absolute error of 5.81E-01, and a mean absolute percentage error of 7.23E-02. These predictions are superior to the comparison prediction model, indicating good predictive performance and stability. Additionally, the established artificial detrusor model also demonstrates outstanding performance in uncertainty and reliability analysis, thereby further confirming its superior comprehensive performance. The optimized artificial detrusor's computed values of emptying rate and temperature increment, as well as its experimental measurement values, have errors of 7.8% and 11.8%, respectively, which satisfy engineering design specifications. The artificial detrusor optimized by our proposed method exhibits significant performance enhancements over existing designs. Specifically, the optimized detrusor achieves an approximately 20% increase in emptying rate and a 62% reduction in temperature increment, successfully balancing urinary efficiency with mitigated risks of thermal tissue injury.

Indexed as

Machine LearningUrinary BladderAlgorithmsAnimalsHumansArtificial detrusorCrayfish optimization algorithmExtreme learning machineMulti-objective grey wolf optimization algorithmMulti-objective optimization design

Identifiers

PMID40263325
PMCPMC12015492

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.