Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40263216›Full record

ArticleHealth & justice2025

"You can't incarcerate yourself out of the drug problem in America:" A qualitative examination of Colorado's 2022 Fentanyl​ criminalization law.

Katherine LeMasters, Samantha Nall, Cole Jurecka, Betsy Craft, Paul Christine, Ingrid Binswanger, Joshua Barocas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health & justice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Katherine LeMastersUniversity of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, USA. katherine.lemasters@cuanschutz.edu.
Samantha NallUniversity of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, USA.
Cole JureckaUniversity of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, USA.
Betsy CraftColorado Drug Policy Coalition, Denver, USA.
Paul ChristineUniversity of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, USA.
Ingrid BinswangerUniversity of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, USA.
Joshua BarocasUniversity of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, USA.

Funding

Development of a novel community-based high-performance surveillance network for drug useDP2DA051864 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI BAROCAS, JOSHUA ADAM · 2020 to 2020
$2.3M
Colorado Department of Human Services RFP IBEH 2023000051NIDA NIH HHS DP2 DA051864NIDA NIH HHS DP2DA051864
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn response to the U.S. overdose crisis, many states have increased criminal penalties for drug possession, particularly fentanyl. This study sought to qualitatively explore diverse community perspectives on increasing criminal legal penalties in Colorado for fentanyl possession (House Bill 22-1326) and the broader role of the criminal legal system in addressing substance use and overdose prevention. We conducted 31 semi-structured interviews in 2023 with community leaders directly working with people who use drugs, individuals with lived experience with drug use and the criminal legal system, and law enforcement throughout Colorado. Interviewees were asked about the perceived impact of House Bill 22-1326 on their communities and agencies. After interviews were complete, we created templated summaries and matrix analyses to conduct rapid qualitative analysis, an action-oriented approach to qualitative data analysis.

resultsRespondents included peer support specialists (n = 7), policymakers (n = 6), community behavioral health/harm reduction providers (n = 6), criminal legal program staff (n = 8), and law enforcement (n = 4), with nine participants from rural counties. Analysis revealed that participants found increasing criminal penalties for fentanyl possession to be misguided: "And the felony [of HB-1326] is such a good example of a policy being led by feelings rather than evidence." This was in the context of participants' divergent views on police as conduits to treatment and punishment and perceiving jail as an (in)appropriate response for substance use disorder treatment.

conclusionsAll participants supported policy efforts to prevent fatal fentanyl overdoses, yet, most thought that increased use of police and incarceration as avenues to prevent overdose was misguided. This study highlights a diverse array of community perspectives that can inform policy decisions concerning criminal penalties for fentanyl possession and distribution and can inform policies that affect people who use drugs broadly.

Indexed as

Community engagementCriminal legal involvementDrug policyFentanyl criminalizationHarm reductionOverdose preventionQualitative researchSubstance use

Identifiers

PMID40263216
PMCPMC12016480

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.