Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40263174›Full record

ArticleEndocrine2025

Dynamic 4 dimensional contrast enhanced MRI for localization in primary hyperparathyroidism.

Sabri Engin Altintop, Mahi Nur Cerit, Emetullah Cindil, Halit Nahit Sendur, Tugba Barlas, Mehmet Muhittin Yalcin, Alev Eroglu Altinova, Mujde Akturk, Fusun Balos Toruner, Mehmet Ayhan Karakoc and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Endocrine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Sabri Engin AltintopGazi University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Ankara, Turkey. sabrienginaltintop@gazi.edu.tr.ORCID 0000-0001-5051-9116
Mahi Nur CeritGazi University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Radiology, Ankara, Turkey.
Emetullah CindilGazi University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Radiology, Ankara, Turkey.
Halit Nahit SendurGazi University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Radiology, Ankara, Turkey.
Tugba BarlasGazi University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Ankara, Turkey.
Mehmet Muhittin YalcinGazi University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Ankara, Turkey.
Alev Eroglu AltinovaGazi University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Ankara, Turkey.
Mujde AkturkGazi University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Ankara, Turkey.
Fusun Balos TorunerGazi University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Ankara, Turkey.
Mehmet Ayhan KarakocGazi University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Ankara, Turkey.
Ethem Turgay CeritGazi University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Ankara, Turkey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeIt can be challenging to localize the lesions in certain cases of primary hyperparathyroidism. Recently, it has been proposed that assessing the localization of parathyroid lesions with dynamic images enhances the diagnostic power of standard MRI (magnetic resonance imaging) due to the hypervascular structure of these lesions. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the success of four-dimensional dynamic perfusion MRI (4D MRI) in localizing parathyroid lesions.

methodsThirty patients who underwent 4-dimensional dynamic MRI diagnosed with primary hyperparathyroidism and indications for surgery, whose USG (ultrasonography) and/or Tc 99m sestamibi SPECT scan were negative or discordant, were included. The sensitivity and positive predictive values (PPV) were calculated for each imaging modality.

resultsOf the 30 patients, 29 had parathyroid adenoma, and one had parathyroid hyperplasia in histopathologic examination. 4D MRI accurately identified the location of parathyroid lesions in 25 of 30 patients (sensitivity 83.3%, PPV 96.1%), whereas USG successfully identified the lesion location in 21 patients (sensitivity 70%, PPV 91.3%) and Tc 99m sestamibi SPECT scan in 17 patients (sensitivity 56.7%, PPV 94.4%). The sensitivity of the combination of three imaging modalities was found to be 96.7%.

conclusion4D MRI can be utilized as a complementary imaging modality to localize parathyroid lesions, offering the advantage of no ionizing radiation, especially when USG and/or Tc 99m sestamibi SPECT scans cannot reliably identify them.

Indexed as

AdenomaHyperparathyroidism, PrimaryMagnetic Resonance ImagingParathyroid GlandsParathyroid NeoplasmsAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPredictive Value of TestsSensitivity and SpecificityTechnetium Tc 99m SestamibiTomography, Emission-Computed, Single-PhotonUltrasonographyTechnetium Tc 99m Sestamibi4D MRIParathyroid adenomaPrimary hyperparathyroidismTc 99m sestamibi SPECT scanUltrasonography

Identifiers

PMID40263174
PMCPMC12227485

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.