Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40263147›Full record

ReviewUnfallchirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany)2025

[Endoprosthesis in proximal humerus fractures -What is important?]

M Kimmeyer, M Hackl, L J Lehmann

Abstract readEnglish AbstractReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Unfallchirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

M KimmeyerOrthopädisch-Unfallchirurgisches Zentrum, Universitätsmedizin Mannheim, Medizinische Fakultät Mannheim, Universität Heidelberg, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167, Mannheim, Deutschland. michael.kimmeyer@umm.de.
M HacklOrthopädisch-Unfallchirurgisches Zentrum, Universitätsmedizin Mannheim, Medizinische Fakultät Mannheim, Universität Heidelberg, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167, Mannheim, Deutschland.
L J LehmannKlinik für Unfall‑, Handchirurgie und Sportmedizin, ViDia Kliniken Karlsruhe, Karlsruhe, Deutschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In cases of complex proximal humeral fractures a fracture prosthesis is an established treatment option. In the geriatric patient population, the use of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty is gaining in relevance. This article focuses on the specific requirements and challenges associated with the application of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. Decisive for the success are a structured perioperative management, meticulous preoperative planning, thorough patient education and standardized protocols for infection and bleeding prophylaxis. Intraoperatively, emphasis is placed on precise implantation techniques and stable tuberosity fixation, of which the latter is essential for postoperative function. A humeral inclination of 135° has been shown to be associated with better tuberosity healing. Complications, such as scapular notching or instability can be minimized through an accurate surgical technique and optimized implant management. Postoperative care is tailored to the individual, employing either a shoulder abduction brace or an early functional rehabilitation approach. Overall, reverse shoulder arthroplasty provides an effective fracture treatment for geriatric patients, ensuring long-term functional and clinical benefits.

Indexed as

Arthroplasty, Replacement, ShoulderShoulder FracturesShoulder ProsthesisAgedHumansPostoperative ComplicationsEarly functional rehabilitationEndoprosthesisOsteoporosisProximal humeral fractureReverse shoulder arthroplasty

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.