Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40263145›Full record

ArticleOsteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA2025

Improved radiological diagnosis of osteoporotic vertebral fragility fractures following UK-wide interventions and re-audit-can this be maintained and translated into clinical practice?

Hannah Adams, L Salman, K J Drinkwater, J Griffin, S Rowntree, D C Howlett

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Recognition and reporting of vertebral fractures in thoracic and abdominal computed tomography images - have we learnt our lesson?Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Hannah AdamsDepartment of Radiology, Eastbourne District General Hospital, Eastbourne, UK. hannahadams@nhs.net.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0007-5854-3728
L SalmanDepartment of Radiology, University Hospitals of Bristol and Weston, Bristol, UK.
K J DrinkwaterDirectorate of Education and Professional Practice, Royal College of Radiologists, London, UK.
J GriffinThe Royal Osteoporosis Society, Bath, UK.
S RowntreeThe Royal Osteoporosis Society, Bath, UK.
D C HowlettDepartment of Radiology, Eastbourne District General Hospital, Eastbourne, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To determine the potential economic, morbidity and mortality impact of improvements in reporting of vertebral fragility fractures (VFFs) following a complete audit cycle. Six percent interval increase in reporting of moderate/severe VFFs results in an additional 890 hip fractures predicted in year one and a potential cost saving of £13,207,000. PURPOSE: To determine the potential economic, morbidity and mortality impact of improvements in reporting of vertebral fragility fractures (VFFs) following an initial UK-wide audit initiated by the Royal College of Radiologists (RCR), collaborating with the Royal Osteoporosis Society (ROS) and Royal College of Physicians (RCP) and subsequent re-audit in 2022.

methodsPatient-specific and organisational questionnaires in 2019 and 2022 involved retrospective analysis of between 50 and 100 consecutive, non-traumatic CT studies which included the thoracolumbar spine where the spine was not the area of clinical interest in patients > 70 years. VFFs were recorded and the severity graded using the Genant reporting system. A series of UK-wide interventions were initiated between the audits. Results of the re-audit were evaluated using a bespoke ROS calculator to identify potential patient related and economic benefits from any improvements demonstrated.

resultsWidespread improvements were evident between the two audits across all audit parameters, both patient-related and organisational. Notably, there was a 6% interval increase in reporting of moderate/severe VFFs (26 to 32%). Extrapolating from NHS England data, approximately 1.8 million non-trauma CT studies including the thoracolumbar spine for patients > 70 years were performed in the UK in 2022. The incidence of VFFs in the 2022 audit was found to be 21.7%. Using these figures and the 6% increase, the number of additional patients potentially diagnosed with a VFF equates to 23,420. Applying the ROS Benefits Calculator, in this cohort of 23,420 patients with no treatment, 890 hip fractures can be predicted in year one. With initiation of treatment, this figure falls to 328 patients (562 hip fractures prevented in year one), a potential cost saving of £13,207,000.

conclusionThe 2022 national re-audit confirmed improvements in radiology diagnostic performance and practice in VFF reporting. Ongoing work is required to build on this improvement and to further embed best practice. To realise this potential, there will need to be significant and maintained investment in onward referral and treatment systems (fracture liaison services or equivalent). Increasing availability of artificial intelligence will significantly increase the diagnoses of these fractures.

Indexed as

Osteoporotic FracturesSpinal FracturesAgedAged, 80 and overCost-Benefit AnalysisFemaleHealth Care CostsHumansMaleMedical AuditMiddle AgedQuality ImprovementRetrospective StudiesTomography, X-Ray ComputedUnited KingdomComputed tomographyEconomic and patient impactGenant reporting systemOsteoporosisVertebral fragility fractures

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.