Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40263144›Full record

ArticleOsteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA2025

Opportunistic assessment of osteoporosis using hip and pelvic X-rays with OsteoSight™: validation of an AI-based tool in a US population.

Robert J Pignolo, John J Connell, Will Briggs, Catherine J Kelly, Chris Tromans, Naima Sultana, J Michael Brady

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. AI-derived opportunistic screening using chest radiographs identifies age- and sex-associated bone mineral density patterns and supports earlier osteoporosis evaluation.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Consensus statement on the application of artificial intelligence in osteoporosis screening and management: perspectives from the Asia-Pacific region.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Robert J PignoloDepartment of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
John J ConnellNaitive Technologies Ltd, London, EC1N 2SW, UK. john.connell@naitive.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7756-9997
Will BriggsNaitive Technologies Ltd, London, EC1N 2SW, UK.
Catherine J KellyNaitive Technologies Ltd, London, EC1N 2SW, UK.
Chris TromansNaitive Technologies Ltd, London, EC1N 2SW, UK.
Naima SultanaNaitive Technologies Ltd, London, EC1N 2SW, UK.
J Michael BradyNaitive Technologies Ltd, London, EC1N 2SW, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Identifying patients at risk of low bone mineral density (BMD) from X-rays presents an attractive approach to increase case finding. This paper showed the diagnostic accuracy, reproducibility, and robustness of a new technology: OsteoSight™. OsteoSight could increase diagnosis and preventive treatment rates for patients with low BMD. PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy, reproducibility, and robustness of OsteoSight™, an automated image analysis tool designed to identify low bone mineral density (BMD) from routine hip and pelvic X-rays. Given the global rise in osteoporosis-related fractures and the limitations of current diagnostic paradigms, OsteoSight offers a scalable solution that integrates into existing clinical workflows.

methodsPerformance of the technology was tested across three key areas: (1) diagnostic accuracy in identifying low BMD as compared to dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), the clinical gold standard; (2) reproducibility, through analysis of two images from the same patient; and (3) robustness, by evaluating the tool's performance across different patient demographics and X-ray scanner hardware.

resultsThe diagnostic accuracy of OsteoSight for identifying patients at risk of low BMD was area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) 0.834 [0.789-0.880], with consistent results across subgroups of clinical confounders and X-ray scanner hardware. Specificity 0.852 [0.783-0.930] and sensitivity 0.628 [0.538-0.743] met pre-specified acceptance criteria. The pre-processing pipeline successfully excluded unsuitable cases including incorrect body parts, metalwork, and unacceptable femur positioning.

conclusionThe results demonstrate that OsteoSight is accurate in identifying patients with low BMD. This suggests its utility as an opportunistic assessment tool, especially in settings where DXA accessibility is limited or not recently performed. The tool's reproducibility and robust performance across various clinical confounders further supports its integration into routine orthopedic and medical practices, potentially broadening the reach of osteoporosis assessment and enabling earlier intervention for at-risk patients.

Indexed as

Hip JointOsteoporosisPelvic BonesAbsorptiometry, PhotonAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBone DensityFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRadiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-AssistedReproducibility of ResultsBMDCase-findingOsteopeniaOsteoporosisX-rays

Identifiers

PMID40263144
PMCPMC12122585

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.