Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40263139›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of urology2025

Comparison of outcome for holmium laser enucleation prostate and Rezum system in benign prostate hyperplasia: a matched pair analysis.

Orkunt Özkaptan, Cüneyd Sevinç, Cengiz Çanakcı, Tahsin Batuhan Aydoğan, Oğuz Türkyılmaz, Mahmut Selman Mert, Alkan Çubuk

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of urology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Orkunt ÖzkaptanDepartment of Urology, Health Sciencies University, Kartal Dr. Lutfi Kirdar City Hospital, D100 Güney Yanyol Cevizli, Kartal, Istanbul, 34890, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3659-1319
Cüneyd SevinçDepartment of Urology, Beylikduzu Medicana Hospital, İstanbul, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6321-5143
Cengiz ÇanakcıDepartment of Urology, Health Sciencies University, Kartal Dr. Lutfi Kirdar City Hospital, D100 Güney Yanyol Cevizli, Kartal, Istanbul, 34890, Turkey. cengizcanakci@hotmail.com.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2654-1986
Tahsin Batuhan AydoğanDepartment of Urology, Health Sciencies University, Kartal Dr. Lutfi Kirdar City Hospital, D100 Güney Yanyol Cevizli, Kartal, Istanbul, 34890, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2000-7790
Oğuz TürkyılmazDepartment of Urology, Health Sciencies University, Kartal Dr. Lutfi Kirdar City Hospital, D100 Güney Yanyol Cevizli, Kartal, Istanbul, 34890, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-3467-5881
Mahmut Selman MertDepartment of Urology, Health Sciencies University, Kartal Dr. Lutfi Kirdar City Hospital, D100 Güney Yanyol Cevizli, Kartal, Istanbul, 34890, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-8052-5437
Alkan ÇubukDepartment of Urology, Bursa Medicana Hospital, Bursa, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9322-9717

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeOur aim was to assess the efficacy and safety of Rezum therapy in patients with symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) in comparison to Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP).

methodsThe retrospective study included 338 patients (204 HoLEP and 134 Rezum) operated on for BPH between January 2020 and November 2024. A 1:1 matching of treated patients (Rezum) to HoLEP patients based on the closest propensity score value was conducted for 131 successful matching pairs. The groups were compared regarding; Age, Prostate volume, PSA, Catheter-dependence, Qmax, PVR, IIEF, IPSS, PGI-I, operation time (OT) and hospital time (HS).

resultsConcerning perioperative data, there was a statistically significant difference between the Rezum and HoLEP groups regarding OT (8.29 ± 1.21 vs. 68.01 ± 31.01 min; P < 0.001) and HS (1 vs. 2.61 ± 1.53 days; P < 0.001) with higher values for HoLEP. At the same time, the catheter duration was longer in the Rezum group (7.6 ± 2.19 vs. 3.49 ± 1.16 days; P < 0.001). In terms of clinical outcomes, there was a statistically significant improvement in Qmax, IPSS and a decrease in PVR at 12 months for the HoLEP group compared to the Rezum group (16.82 ± 2.27 ml/sn vs. 22.14 ± 7.17 ml/sn, P < 0.001; 12.1 ± 2.1 vs. 7.1 ± 1.9, P < 0.001; 43.05 ± 32.62 ml vs. 29.73 ± 43.73 ml, P = 0.006; respectively). PGI-I scores (p = 0.620) and antegrade ejaculation (p < 0.001) were in favour of Rezum therapy.

conclusionThe HoLEP technique demonstrates superior functional outcomes compared to Rezum, particularly in cases with larger prostates. However, Rezum is an ejaculation-sparing technique demonstrating high tolerability, and patient satisfaction even in larger prostates.

Indexed as

Lasers, Solid-StateLaser TherapyProstatectomyProstatic HyperplasiaAgedHumansMaleMatched-Pair AnalysisMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeBenign prostatic hyperplasiaHolmium laser enucleationRezumTransurethral resection of prostate

Identifiers

PMID40263139
PMCPMC12014818

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.