ArticleSurgical endoscopy2025
Deep learning-based intraoperative visual guidance model for ureter identification in laparoscopic sigmoidectomy.
Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- A novel artificial intelligence anatomical model for landmark recognition in endolaparoscopic totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
- AI-powered semantic segmentation model for enhanced ureteral mapping and real-time instrument feedback in robotic colorectal surgery.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Article
- Which Method Best Predicts Postoperative Complications: Deep Learning, Machine Learning, or Conventional Logistic Regression?Annals of gastroenterological surgery · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence real-time overall recognition model for total mesorectal excision.International journal of surgery (London, England) · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Gastrointestinal Surgery: A Systematic Review of Its Role in Laparoscopic and Robotic Surgery.Journal of personalized medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIdentifying the left ureter is a key step while performing laparoscopic sigmoid resection to prevent intraoperative injury and postoperative complications.
methodsThis feasibility study aims to evaluate the real-time performance of a deep learning-based computer vision model in identifying the left ureter during laparoscopic sigmoid resection. A deep learning model for ureteral identification was developed using a semantic segmentation algorithm trained from intraoperative images of ureteral dissection in videos depicted from laparoscopic sigmoid resection. We used 86 laparoscopic sigmoid resection recordings performed at King Abdulaziz University Hospital (KAUH), which were further processed with manual annotation. A total of 1237 images were extracted and annotated by three colorectal surgeons. Deep learning You Only Look Once (YOLO) versions 8 and 11 models were applied to the video recording of ureteral identification. Per-frame five-fold cross-validation was used to evaluate model performance.
resultsExperiments showed high results with a mean Average Precision (mAP50) of 0.92 for the Intersection over Union (IoU) threshold greater than or equal to 0.5. The precision, recall, and Dice Coefficient (DC) evaluation metrics are 0.94, 0.88, and 0.90, respectively. The highest DC result is 0.95, achieved through the fourth-fold cross-validation. The stricter IoU threshold between 0.5 and 0.95 is represented by mAP50-95, which is 0.53. The model operated at a speed of 32 Frames Per Second (FPS), indicating it can work in real-time.
conclusionDeep learning YOLO 8 and 10 for semantic segmentation demonstrates accurate real-time identification of the left ureter in selected videos. A deep learning model could be used to project high-accuracy identification of real-time left ureter during laparoscopic sigmoidectomy using surgeons' expertise in intraoperative image navigation. Limitations included the sample size, lack of diversity in the methods of surgery, incomplete surgical processes, and lack of external validation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40263136What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.