ArticleBMJ open2025
Perceptions of participants and organisers of a social prescribing programme for hospital staff through horticulture (SP4S-H) in the community hospitals in Singapore: a qualitative study.
Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Empowerment Model for The Elderly and Community to Improve the Welfare of the Elderly.F1000Research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesHospital workers face multiple biopsychosocial stressors in the course of their work, which could potentially be addressed by social prescribing of horticultural activities. However, the effectiveness of such interventions has not been evaluated. We conducted a qualitative study to understand the perceptions of participants and organisers of a horticulture-based social prescribing intervention for staff (SP4S-H) in three community hospitals in Singapore.
designThe RE-AIM Planning and Evaluation Framework was used to develop our semistructured interview guides and guided our thematic analysis. Indepth interviews were conducted with subsequent transcribing, coding and iterative analysis until thematic saturation was reached.
settingThree community hospitals in Singapore, between May 2022 and June 2024.
participants26 hospital staff.
resultsSP4S-H was perceived to have a positive impact on staff, including increasing their knowledge on horticulture, team bonding, positive emotions and self-help skills. Barriers to participation included participants preferring not to spend time outside working hours (ie, lunch hours) for SP4S-H or attending physical meetings. Appealing to the interest of staff, overcoming barriers in their attendance, organising the events and improving the working culture of participants were found to influence the reach, implementation and sustainability of SP4S-H.
conclusionSP4S-H was perceived to be beneficial by hospital workers in improving social connectedness and their ability to cope with stress. The importance of having the support of senior management, adequacy of resources and deliberate staff engagement in rolling out this initiative cannot be underestimated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.