Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40262902›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2025

Single-Trial fMRI Decoding of 3D Motion with Stereoscopic and Perspective Cues.

Puti Wen, Lowell W Thompson, Ari Rosenberg, Michael S Landy, Bas Rokers

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. The Richness of Vision in the Mammalian Brain: Neural Codes for Visual Perception and Behavior in Three Dimensions.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Puti WenPsychology, New York University Abu Dhabi, Abu Dhabi, UAE.ORCID 0000-0002-0431-5101
Lowell W ThompsonDepartment of Neuroscience, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104.
Ari RosenbergDepartment of Neuroscience, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin 53705.ORCID 0000-0002-8606-2987
Michael S LandyDepartment of Psychology and Center for Neural Science, New York University, New York, New York 10003.ORCID 0000-0002-2079-4552
Bas RokersPsychology, New York University Abu Dhabi, Abu Dhabi, UAE rokers@nyu.edu.

Funding

WNPRC Supplemental Request for Nonhuman Primate Enclosures to Equip HIV/AIDS-Related Research FacilitiesP51OD011106 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI Dorota A. Grejner-Brzezinska · 2012 to 2026
$150.7M
SHAPE REPRESENTATION AND MULTIPLE DEPTH CUESR01EY008266 · NEI · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY · PI MICHAEL S LANDY · 1989 to 2026
$7.7M
Cortical processing of three-dimensional object-motionR01EY035005 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI Ari Rosenberg · 2023 to 2026
$1.8M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY008266NEI NIH HHS R01 EY035005NIH HHS P51 OD011106
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

How does the brain process 3D motion? We focused on the human motion complex (hMT+), extending insights from monkey studies. Using 3D-motion stimuli containing perspective and/or stereoscopic cues, we investigated the hierarchy within the motion complex in humans of both sexes to understand the neural mechanisms underlying motion perception. On each trial we decoded 3D motion direction (toward/away) based on the BOLD response in primary visual cortex (V1), and regions within hMT+ including the middle temporal (MT) and medial superior temporal (MST) areas, and the fundus of the superior temporal sulcus (FST). We found that 3D-motion direction could be reliably decoded from all four areas but accuracy depended on cue content. MT and FST showed greatest decoding accuracy with perspective and stereoscopic cues, respectively. Decoding of motion direction in V1 and MST could be explained by retinotopic biases in the BOLD response to motion stimuli. MT and FST were less impacted by such biases. We also identified significant behavioral differences between participants: some were proficient at using stereoscopic cues and others performed near chance. Good behavioral performance with stereoscopic cues was accompanied by better decoding performance in FST but not MT. A control experiment that eliminated 3D motion percepts for stereoscopic stimuli, but not perspective stimuli, revealed that unlike MT, decoding accuracy in FST was influenced by perceptual components of 3D motion. Our findings support that MT and FST play distinct roles in the analysis of visual motion and are key in the transformation of retinal input into perceptual report.

Indexed as

CuesDepth PerceptionMagnetic Resonance ImagingMotion PerceptionVisual CortexAdultBrain MappingFemaleHumansMalePhotic StimulationYoung Adult3D motionbinocular visionfundus of the superior temporal sulcusmiddle temporal areaMT complex

Identifiers

PMID40262902
PMCPMC12121709

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.