Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40262897›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2025

Single Neuron Contributions to the Auditory Brainstem EEG.

Paula T Kuokkanen, Ira Kraemer, Christine Köppl, Catherine E Carr, Richard Kempter

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. A tale of two ears: development of binaural auditory processing in the big brown bat.Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Paula T KuokkanenInstitute for Theoretical Biology, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin 10115, Germany paula.kuokkanen@hu-berlin.de.ORCID 0000-0003-1355-227X
Ira KraemerDepartment of Biology, University of Maryland College Park, College Park, MD 20742.
Christine KöpplDepartment of Neuroscience, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Research Center for Neurosensory Sciences and Cluster of Excellence "Hearing4all" Carl von Ossietzky Universität, Oldenburg 26129, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-0729-709X
Catherine E CarrDepartment of Biology, University of Maryland College Park, College Park, MD 20742.ORCID 0000-0001-5698-6014
Richard KempterInstitute for Theoretical Biology, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin 10115, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-5344-2983

Funding

CELLULAR MECHANISMS UNDERLYING SOUND LOCALIZATIONR01DC000436 · NIDCD · UNIV OF MARYLAND, COLLEGE PARK · PI CARR, CATHERINE EMILY · 1994 to 2017
$6.1M
Development of Temporal Fine structureR01DC019341 · NIDCD · UNIV OF MARYLAND, COLLEGE PARK · PI CARR, CATHERINE EMILY · 2021 to 2025
$1.6M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC000436NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC019341
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The auditory brainstem response (ABR) is an acoustically evoked EEG potential that is an important diagnostic tool for hearing loss, especially in newborns. The ABR originates from the response sequence of auditory nerve and brainstem nuclei, and a click-evoked ABR typically shows three positive peaks ("waves") within the first six milliseconds. However, an assignment of the waves of the ABR to specific sources is difficult, and a quantification of contributions to the ABR waves is not available. Here, we exploit the large size and physical separation of the barn owl first-order cochlear nucleus magnocellularis (NM) to estimate single-cell contributions to the ABR. We simultaneously recorded NM neurons' spikes and the EEG in owls of both sexes, and found that [Formula: see text] spontaneous single-cell spikes are necessary to isolate a significant spike-triggered average (STA) response at the EEG electrode. An average single-neuron contribution to the ABR was predicted by convolving the STA with the cell's peri-stimulus time histogram. Amplitudes of predicted contributions of single NM cells typically reached 32.9 ± 1.1 nV (mean ± SE, range: 2.5-162.7 nV), or [Formula: see text] (median ± SE; range from 0.01% to 1%) of the ABR amplitude. The time of the predicted peak coincided best with the peak of the ABR wave II, independent of the click sound level. Our results suggest that individual neurons' contributions to an EEG can vary widely, and that wave II of the ABR is shaped by NM units.

Indexed as

Brain StemCochlear NucleusElectroencephalographyEvoked Potentials, Auditory, Brain StemNeuronsAcoustic StimulationAction PotentialsAnimalsFemaleMaleStrigiformesauditoryavianbarn owlbrainstemEEGmagnocellularis

Identifiers

PMID40262897
PMCPMC12121712

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.