SynthesisThe journal of spinal cord medicine2026
Effects of virtual reality on psychological distress in individuals with spinal cord injury: A systematic review.
Synthesis in The journal of spinal cord medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
contextPsychological distress is common among individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI). Virtual reality (VR) is an innovative technology used in treating patients with neurological disorders.
objectivesThis systematic review aims to explore the effects of VR on psychological distress in individuals with SCI.
methodsA comprehensive search was conducted in "PubMed, PEDro, REHABDATA, MEDLINE, SCOPUS, EMBASE, CINAHL, and Web of Science" databases from inception to November 1, 2024. Studies included individuals with SCI with various levels or completeness of injury, administrated VR intervention independently or in combination with other treatments, compared with passive, active, or no control interventions, and evaluated psychological distress were included. The "Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro)" scale was used to assess the risk of bias in eligible studies.
resultsEight out of 405 studies were included in this systematic review. A total of 159 individuals with SCI (male 67%, mean age 49.6 years) were included in this systematic review. The results were synthesized using a a descriptive analysis. The included studies showed that administrating multiple sessions of VR independently or in combination with cognitive training or conventional physiotherapy reduces depression, anxiety, and stress in individuals with SCI.
conclusionsVR has potential immediate benefits on psychological distress in individuals with SCI. SCI individuals with various severity, level, and duration of injury might benefit from the intervention. However, these findings should be interpreted with caution. Further studies are strongly recommended to understand the long-term effects of VR, determine the most effective treatment protocol, and identify which SCI populations are more likely to benefit from the intervention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.