ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2025
The Benefits of Integrating Electronic Medical Record Systems Between Primary and Specialist Care Institutions: Mixed Methods Cohort Study.
Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Assessing digital health curriculum needs: a mixed-methods study of student and faculty perspectives in a Singapore medical school.Medical education online · 2026Article
- Understanding Remission of Long-Term Conditions Through Electronic Health Records: Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Challenges of Electronic Medical Record Implementation From the Perspective of Hospital Leaders in Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia's Public Hospitals:Saudi medical journal · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe benefits of a fully integrated electronic medical record (EMR) system across primary and specialist care institutions have yet to be formally established. Integrating the EMR systems between primary and specialist care is the first step in building a medical neighborhood. A medical neighborhood is a set of policies and procedures implemented through integrated systems and processes that support the joint management of patient care across primary care physicians, specialist physicians, and other health care providers.
objectiveThis study aims to quantify the impacts of integrating the EMR systems of primary and specialist care institutions in the process of developing a medical neighborhood. The impacts are operationalized in both quantitative and qualitative measures, measuring the benefits of such an integration in 3 specific areas, namely, patient diagnosis tracking, patient care management, and patient coordination.
methodsA comprehensive, mixed methods examination was conducted using 3 different data sources (EMR consultation data, clinician survey data, and in-depth interviews). The EMR data consist of patient encounters referred to a specialist clinic from 6 primary care providers before and after integrating the EMR system into the primary and specialist care institutions. We analyzed 25,404 specialist consultation referrals to the specialist clinics by the primary care partners for a 12-month period, during which the integration of the EMR system was conducted. A cohort empirical investigation was used to identify the quantitative impacts of the EMR integration, and a follow-up survey was conducted with the clinicians 18 months post integration. The clinicians' perceptions of the integration were measured to triangulate the empirical observation from the patient encounters, and the postimplementation perception survey was analyzed to triangulate the empirical investigation of consultation instances of the earlier cohort. Concurrently, a total of 30 interviews were conducted between March 16, 2021, and July 28, 2021, with clinicians and operations staff to gather on-the-ground sentiments engendered by this integration, which further informed our quantitative findings.
resultsThe integration of EMR systems between primary and specialist care institutions was associated with benefits in patient diagnosis tracking, patient care management, and patient coordination. Specifically, it was found that the integration resulted in a decrease in wait time for specialist appointments of an average of 16.5 days (P<.001). Patients were also subjected to fewer repeated procedures and tests; the number of procedures (P=.006), radiographies (P=.02), and overall bill sizes (P=.004) all decreased by between 4.08% and 39.7%, resulting in reduced health care resource wastage while maintaining similar medical outcomes (P=.37).
conclusionsOur study's results are among the first instances of empirical evidence to show that the integration and sharing of data between primary and specialist care institutions promote continuity in health care delivery and joint patient management in a medical neighborhood. The findings go beyond the traditional benefits of improved referral communication, as shown in prior literature.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.