ArticlePLoS computational biology2025
TGF-M: Topology-augmented geometric features enhance molecular property prediction.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Accurate prediction of molecular properties is a key component of Artificial Intelligence-driven Drug Design (AIDD). Despite significant progress in improving these predictive models, balancing accuracy with computational complexity remains a challenge. Molecular topological and geometric features provide rich spatial information, crucial for improving prediction accuracy, but their extraction typically increases model complexity. To address this, we propose TGF-M (Topology-augmented Geometric Features for Molecular Property Prediction), a novel predictive model that optimizes feature extraction to enhance information capture and improve model accuracy, and reduces model complexity to lower computational cost. This approach enhances the model's ability to leverage both topological and geometric features without unnecessary complexity. On the re-segmented PCQM4Mv2 dataset, TGF-M performs remarkably, achieving a low mean absolute error (MAE) of 0.0647 in the HOMO-LUMO gap prediction task with only 6.4M parameters. Compared to two recent state-of-the-art models evaluated within a unified validation framework, TGF-M demonstrates comparable performance with less than one-tenth of the parameters. We conducted an in-depth analysis of TGF-M's chemical interpretability. The results further validate the method's effectiveness in leveraging complex molecular topology and geometry during model learning, underscoring its potential and advantages. The trained models and source code of TGF-M are publicly available at https://github.com/TiAW-Go/TGF-M.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.