ArticlePloS one2025
Socioeconomic status and older adult's experiences of weight loss: a qualitative secondary analysis.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesUnintentional weight loss in older adults is common, with 15-20% of those aged >65 having clinically significant weight loss, associated with increased mortality and morbidity. People with socioeconomic disadvantage are more likely to be overweight but also to become frailer in older age. We explore if socioeconomic status impacts upon patients' experience of unplanned weight loss.
methodsQualitative secondary analysis of 23 semi-structured interviews with older adults from two prior studies i), those at risk of frailty ii) those with cancer. Reflexive thematic analysis was conducted, using the lens of the Nutrition Equity Framework, on anonymised transcripts with formation of themes and subthemes, with relationships between themes investigated.
resultsMean age 73 years, range 65-87; 34% male, Index of Multiple Deprivation Quintiles IMD 1 (n=9), IMD 2 (n=4), IMD 3 (n=3), IMD 4 (n=6), IMD 5 (n=1). Three major themes were identified. 1. 'Healthcare Systems'; interactions with either public health or individual healthcare systems influence patient experiences of weight loss. 2. 'Personal Factors'; that influence a patient's view of weight loss and the likelihood of weight loss prompting help-seeking behaviour 3. 'Can I Change?'; patients' perspectives of their ability to implement change. Factors in each of the themes were understood through motivating (reinforcing) and demotivating (balancing) factors.
conclusionsThis study demonstrates that there is structural and individual inequity in individual views, identification, and clinical management of weight loss. The consequences of this disproportionately affect the most deprived, further confounding the inequalities that already exist.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.