Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40261886›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Opportunities and challenges within green spaces during COVID-19: Perspectives of visitors and managers in Maine, USA.

Alyssa Soucy, Elizabeth Pellecer Rivera, Natalie Siwek, Lucy Martin, Sarah Jackson, Gabrielle Venne, Augusta Stockman, Sandra De Urioste-Stone

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Alyssa SoucySchool of Forest Resources, University of Maine, Orono, Maine, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-6029-6382
Elizabeth Pellecer RiveraEcology and Environmental Sciences, University of Maine, Orono, Maine, United States of America.
Natalie SiwekThomas H. Gosnell School of Life Sciences, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rochester, New York, United States of America.
Lucy MartinEcology and Environmental Sciences, University of Maine, Orono, Maine, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-3948-0913
Sarah JacksonPark Management & Conservation, Kansas State University, Manhattan, Kansas, United States of America.
Gabrielle VenneSchool of Forest Resources, University of Maine, Orono, Maine, United States of America.
Augusta StockmanDepartment of Sociology, Vassar College, Poughkeepsie, New York, United States of America.
Sandra De Urioste-StoneSchool of Forest Resources, University of Maine, Orono, Maine, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-7284-649X

Funding

National Science Foundation 1824961National Science Foundation 1828466National Science Foundation 1849802
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

COVID-19 impacted, and continues to impact, green spaces across the world, altering visitation patterns, and presenting novel management challenges. As COVID-19 has evolved, the long-term implications on communication, management, and conflict as diverse people interact in green spaces remains uncertain. Our work responds to calls to consider diverse perspectives of individuals whose lives intersect with green spaces. Using a qualitative case study methodology, we explored the meanings and experiences of green space managers and visitors in the State of Maine, USA, during the COVID-19 pandemic between May 2021 and July 2023. We triangulated across five research projects including: phenomenological interviews of conservation practitioners, an online questionnaire of staff from a state conservation agency, and three surveys of visitors to green spaces across Maine. Taken together, our results highlight how COVID-19 increased the number and diversity of visitors to green spaces as a result of the outdoor visitation opportunities provided perceived as "safe" during the pandemic. While managers described the benefits from increased visitation on funding and legislative support, they also identified challenges and negative impacts to local ecology as a result of new and greater use. Our results have implications for communication and management for policy makers and natural resource managers who seek to maintain support for conservation goals and address visitor safety and well-being. Managers maintained flexibility in their decision-making to remain nimble and responsive to emerging opportunities and challenges associated with the pandemic. In addition, our results highlight that the scale of change on human behavior from COVID-19 offers a glimpse into what may be possible if that same level of urgency was applied to issues like climate change.

Indexed as

Conservation of Natural ResourcesCOVID-19Parks, RecreationalHumansMainePandemicsSARS-CoV-2Surveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID40261886
PMCPMC12013927

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.