ArticleJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA2026
Improving clinical decision support through interpretable machine learning and error handling in electronic health records.
Article in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo develop an electronic medical record (EMR) data processing tool that confers clinical context to machine learning (ML) algorithms for error handling, bias mitigation, and interpretability. MATERIALS AND
methodsWe present Trust-MAPS, an algorithm that translates clinical domain knowledge into high-dimensional, mixed-integer programming models that capture physiological and biological constraints on clinical measurements. EMR data are projected onto this constrained space, effectively bringing outliers to fall within a physiologically feasible range. We then compute the distance of each data point from the constrained space modeling healthy physiology to quantify deviation from the norm. These distances, termed "trust-scores," are integrated into the feature space for downstream ML applications. We demonstrate the utility of Trust-MAPS by training a binary classifier for early sepsis prediction on data from the 2019 PhysioNet Computing in Cardiology Challenge, using the XGBoost algorithm and applying SMOTE for overcoming class-imbalance.
resultsThe Trust-MAPS framework shows desirable behavior in handling potential errors and boosting predictive performance. We achieve an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.91 (95% CI, 0.89-0.92) for predicting sepsis 6 hours before onset-a marked 15% improvement over a baseline model trained without Trust-MAPS. DISCUSSIONS: Downstream classification performance improves after Trust-MAPS preprocessing, highlighting the bias reducing capabilities of the error-handling projections. Trust-scores emerge as clinically meaningful features that not only boost predictive performance for clinical decision support tasks but also lend interpretability to ML models.
conclusionThis work is the first to translate clinical domain knowledge into mathematical constraints, model cross-vital dependencies, and identify aberrations in high-dimensional medical data. Our method allows for error handling in EMR and confers interpretability and superior predictive power to models trained for clinical decision support.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.