SynthesisPloS one2025
Impact of altitude correction on bronchopulmonary dysplasia prevalence: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) presents a significant respiratory challenge in infants born prematurely. Socioeconomic factors and environmental determinants, including altitude, play pivotal roles in shaping respiratory health outcomes among premature infants. This study aimed to investigate the prevalence of BPD among preterm infants based on altitude, considering the impact of altitude correction on prevalence estimates. By examining altitude-related variations in BPD prevalence, the study sought to provide insights essential for guiding interventions aimed at preventing and managing respiratory conditions in this vulnerable population. The study protocol was registered with PROSPERO, and a systematic search of five databases (PubMed, Web of Science, ScienceDirect, ProQuest, and Google Scholar) was conducted without any restrictions on the date of publication. Eligible studies were identified based on predefined inclusion criteria, including retrospective or prospective studies reporting BPD prevalence at different altitudes, the use of standard diagnostic criteria for BPD, and the exclusion of studies involving non-human subjects or those lacking altitude-adjusted data. The risk of bias assessment was conducted using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme checklist. Statistical analysis included calculating pooled prevalence estimates using a random-effects model, performing subgroup analyses, and assessing heterogeneity and publication bias. The search yielded 339 records, of which ten articles met the inclusion criteria and had a low risk of bias. The altitude-unadjusted BPD prevalence was 41.35% (95% CI 28.62; 55.34%) and ranged from 19.73% (95% CI 16.44; 23.48%) to 71.02% (95% CI 68.33; 73.56%) across different altitude categories. The altitude-adjusted pooled mean BPD prevalence was 26.70% (95% CI 19.60; 35.25%). This systematic review and meta-analysis highlight altitude-related variations in BPD prevalence among preterm infants. Altitude adjustment is crucial for understanding the true prevalence of BPD and guiding tailored interventions in high-altitude regions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.