ReviewChemical reviews2025
From Mining to Manufacturing: Scientific Challenges and Opportunities behind Battery Production.
Review in Chemical reviews, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Electrochemical variability of natural mineral mixtures as electrode materials in Li-ion batteries.EES batteries · 2026Article
- Li Jump Diffusion and Long-Range Transport in Garnet Single Crystals: Spanning the kHz-GHz Range.Chemistry of materials : a publication of the American Chemical Society · 2026Article
- Fluoride ions as charge carriers in electrochemical energy storage.Nature materials · 2026Review
- Hollow Graphitic Nanoshells as a Material for Ion Batteries.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Advancing Battery Manufacturing: Synchrotron Characterization for Industry.Chemical reviews · 2026Review
- Advancing Porous Carbons: Understanding the Importance of Surface Chemistry for the Energy-Environment Nexus.Chemical reviews · 2026Review
- Reversing the polycrystalline rules in single-crystal battery positive electrodes.Nature nanotechnology · 2026Article
- Mechanistic Understanding of Thermal Stability and Safety in Lithium Metal Batteries.Chemical reviews · 2026Review
- Influence of pressure on structure, stability and ionic conductivity of lithium argyrodite solid electrolytes.NPJ energy materials · 2026Article
- Single Crystal Cathode Materials for Lithium-Based Batteries: Synthesis, Scaleup, and Manufacturing.Chemical reviews · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This Review explores the status and progress made over the past decade in the areas of raw material mining, battery materials and components scale-up, processing, and manufacturing. While substantial advancements have been achieved in understanding battery materials, the transition to large-scale manufacturing introduces scientific challenges that must be addressed from multiple perspectives. Rather than focusing on new material discoveries or incremental performance improvements, this Review focuses on the critical issues that arise in battery manufacturing and highlights the importance of cost-oriented fundamental research to bridge the knowledge gap between fundamental research and industrial production. Challenges and opportunities in integrating machine learning (ML) and artificial intelligence (AI) to digitalize the manufacturing process and eventually realize fully autonomous production are discussed. The review also emphasizes the pressing need for workforce development to meet the growing demands of the battery industry. Potential strategies are suggested for accelerating the manufacturing of current and future battery technologies, ensuring that the workforce is equipped with the necessary skills to support research, development, and large-scale production.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.