Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40261653›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2025

Semantic Clinical Artificial Intelligence vs Native Large Language Model Performance on the USMLE.

Peter L Elkin, Guresh Mehta, Frank LeHouillier, Melissa Resnick, Sarah Mullin, Crystal Tomlin, Skyler Resendez, Jiaxing Liu, Jonathan R Nebeker, Steven H Brown

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Peter L ElkinDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York.
Guresh MehtaDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York.
Frank LeHouillierDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York.
Melissa ResnickDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York.
Sarah MullinRoswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, New York.
Crystal TomlinDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York.
Skyler ResendezDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York.
Jiaxing LiuDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York.
Jonathan R NebekerClinical Informatics, Department of Veterans Affairs, Washington, DC.
Steven H BrownClinical Informatics, Department of Veterans Affairs, Washington, DC.

Funding

University of Buffalo Clinical and Translational Science Institute - Supplement SchulyerUL1TR001412 · NCATS · STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT BUFFALO · PI MURPHY, TIMOTHY F · 2015 to 2024
$33.8M
National Library of Medicine Conference 2022T15LM012495 · NLM · STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT BUFFALO · PI PETER L. ELKIN · 2017 to 2026
$4.3M
Pain Medication Prescriptions and Misuse Following Treatment for Alcohol Use DisordersR33AA026954 · NIAAA · STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT BUFFALO · PI ELKIN, PETER L., LEONARD, KENNETH E · 2020 to 2022
$1.0M
Buffalo Research Innovation in Genomic and Healthcare Technology (BRIGHT) Short-Term Training and EducationR25LM014213 · NLM · STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT BUFFALO · PI PETER L. ELKIN, RAM SAMUDRALA · 2022 to 2026
$668k
Pain Medication Prescriptions and Misuse Following Treatment for Alcohol Use DisordersR21AA026954 · NIAAA · STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT BUFFALO · PI ELKIN, PETER L., LEONARD, KENNETH E · 2018 to 2019
$386k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001412NIAAA NIH HHS R21 AA026954NIAAA NIH HHS R33 AA026954NLM NIH HHS R25 LM014213NLM NIH HHS T15 LM012495
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Large language models (LLMs) are being implemented in health care. Enhanced accuracy and methods to maintain accuracy over time are needed to maximize LLM benefits. Objective: To evaluate whether LLM performance on the US Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) can be improved by including formally represented semantic clinical knowledge. Design, Setting, and Participants: This comparative effectiveness research study was conducted between June 2024 and February 2025 at the Department of Biomedical Informatics, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York, using sample questions from the USMLE Steps 1, 2, and 3. Intervention: Semantic clinical artificial intelligence (SCAI) was developed to insert formally represented semantic clinical knowledge into LLMs using retrieval augmented generation (RAG). Main Outcomes and Measures: The SCAI method was evaluated by comparing the performance of 3 Llama LLMs (13B, 70B, and 405B; Meta) with and without SCAI RAG on text-based questions from the USMLE Steps 1, 2, and 3. LLM accuracy for answering questions was determined by comparing the LLM output with the USMLE answer key. Results: The LLMs were tested on 87 questions in the USMLE Step 1, 103 in Step 2, and 123 in Step 3. The 13B LLM enhanced by SCAI RAG was associated with significantly improved performance on Steps 1 and 3 but only met the 60% passing threshold on Step 3 (74 questions correct [60.2%]). The 70B and 405B LLMs passed all the USMLE steps with and without SCAI RAG. The SCAI RAG 70B model scored 80 questions (92.0%) correctly on Step 1, 82 (79.6%) on Step 2, and 112 (91.1%) on Step 3. The SCAI RAG 405B model scored 79 (90.8%) correctly on Step 1, 87 (84.5%) on Step 2, and 117 (95.1%) on Step 3. Significant improvements associated with SCAI RAG were found for the 13B model on Steps 1 and 3, the 70B model on Step 2, and the 405B parameter model on Step 3. The 70B model was significantly better than the 13B model, and the 405B model was not significantly better than the 70B model. Conclusions and Relevance: In this comparative effectiveness research study, SCAI RAG was associated with significantly improved scores on the USMLE Steps 1, 2, and 3. The 13B model passed Step 3 with RAG, and the 70B and 405B models passed and scored well on Steps 1, 2, and 3 with or without augmentation. New forms of reasoning by LLMs, like semantic reasoning, have potential to improve the accuracy of LLM performance on important medical questions. Improving LLM performance in health care with targeted, up-to-date clinical knowledge is an important step in LLM implementation and acceptance.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceEducational MeasurementLicensure, MedicalSemanticsComparative Effectiveness ResearchHumansLarge Language ModelsUnited States

Identifiers

PMID40261653
PMCPMC12015668

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.