ArticleJournal of nephrology2025
Learning from the implementation phase of the new French capitation payment model for chronic kidney disease care: a qualitative study.
Article in Journal of nephrology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundFrance introduced a new payment model for care providers of patients with Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) Grades 4 and 5: the CKD-Capitation Payment model. The model aims to financially incentivise multidisciplinary care for patients. We performed a qualitative study among participating providers to identify obstacles and facilitators of the model implementation as well as the initial benefits and potential policy improvements.
methodsFrom March to July 2023, we collected data through semi-structured interviews with medical and managerial staff of facilities participating in the new model in France. We purposely selected a sample of facilities based on ownership status and CKD-Capitation Payment model activity data, including the number of patients reported. We performed a thematic analysis of the interview transcripts.
resultsWe interviewed 22 staff from 14 facilities. Interviews revealed that adapting the information systems to the model requirements was a major obstacle to implementation, undermining efficient medical time allocation and data quality. Securing facility management support and organising the care amid workforce shortages were additional obstacles. Despite these challenges, staff reported positively on the model, noting the increased time spent by nurses with patients and the assertion of dietitians' role. Interviewees reported the need for greater flexibility in visit requirements to better align with patient needs.
conclusionsThis study demonstrates how the new capitation payment model introduced in France can enable multidisciplinary and coordinated care for patients with CKD. However, supporting facilities in adopting interoperable information systems and increasing the flexibility of the model appear essential for long-term adoption.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.