ArticleInternational urology and nephrology2025
Analysis of the efficacy of modified laparoscopic ureterobladder reimplantation in the treatment of ureterovaginal fistula.
Article in International urology and nephrology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveAnalysis of technical improvements and efficacy of modified laparoscopic ureteral bladder reimplantation for the treatment of ureterovaginal fistula.
methodsA retrospective analysis was conducted on clinical data from 20 patients who developed a ureterovaginal fistula due to gynecological surgeries and underwent modified laparoscopic ureteral bladder reimplantation at our hospital from September 2018 to May 2024.
results20 patients with ureterovaginal fistula were included, with 9 cases on the left side, 9 on the right side, and 2 bilateral. The locations of the ureterovaginal fistulas were all in the distal ureter. The average age was 50.24 ± 5.22 years, and the average body mass index was 23.22 ± 3.98. The average duration of urine leakage before surgery was 12.20 ± 7.05 days. All surgeries were successful (20/20), with an average operation time of 140.85 ± 55.80 min, intraoperative blood loss of 14.50 ± 7.42 ml, and postoperative hospital stay of 8.24 ± 4.47 days. The ureteral stents were left in place for a mean duration of (51.50 ± 9.65) days postoperatively. No complications occurred after the surgery, and imaging follow-up at 9 months indicated that all patients had recovered well.
conclusionEarly diagnosis and treatment are essential for patients with ureterovaginal fistula. During the modified ureteral bladder reimplantation, it is crucial to ensure tension-free anastomosis without excessive dissection of the distal ureter. Laparoscopic ureteral bladder reimplantation is a reliable, safe, minimally invasive, and well-accepted surgical method, deserving of further promotion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40261589What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.