Trial reportEpilepsia2025
Pharmacodynamic interactions between seletracetam and antiseizure comedications in the human photosensitivity model.
Trial report in Epilepsia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We recently reported that seletracetam (SEL), a highly potent derivative of levetiracetam (LEV), reduces or abolishes the photoparoxysmal electroencephalographic response (PPR) to intermittent photic stimulation (IPS) in patients with epilepsy. Most of the 27 patients in this study were on comedication with different antiseizure medications (ASMs). Here, we reanalyzed the raw data of this clinical trial to determine which, if any, of the ASMs reduced (or increased) the effect of SEL on PPR in individual patients. This was possible because a group of six patients were not taking any ASM, and groups of similar size received different comedications. The effect size of SEL on the standard photosensitivity range (SPR) was calculated by the area under the effect curve from 0 to 8 h (AUEC [0-8]) as SPR change from predose. All patients experienced PPRs in response to IPS during placebo treatment, indicating that the PPR was resistant to treatment with their steady-state ASMs. Oral single-dose treatment with SEL reduced/abolished PPR in most (32/36) exposures, but significant effects of ASM comedication were found. Patients comedicated with LEV + lamotrigine or LEV + valproate exhibited significantly lower AUEC (0-8)s than patients without comedication, whereas no significant effects of lamotrigine or valproate alone were found. Despite the significant reduction of AUEC (0-8) in patients on comedication with LEV, SEL still reduced or abolished PPR in the majority (7/9) of exposures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.