ArticleRadiological physics and technology2025
A CT-free deep-learning-based attenuation and scatter correction for copper-64 PET in different time-point scans.
Article in Radiological physics and technology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study aimed to develop and evaluate a deep-learning model for attenuation and scatter correction in whole-body 64Cu-based PET imaging. A swinUNETR model was implemented using the MONAI framework. Whole-body PET-nonAC and PET-CTAC image pairs were used for training, where PET-nonAC served as the input and PET-CTAC as the output. Due to the limited number of Cu-based PET/CT images, a model pre-trained on 51 Ga-PSMA PET images was fine-tuned on 15 Cu-based PET images via transfer learning. The model was trained without freezing layers, adapting learned features to the Cu-based dataset. For testing, six additional Cu-based PET images were used, representing 1-h, 12-h, and 48-h time points, with two images per group. The model performed best at the 12-h time point, with an MSE of 0.002 ± 0.0004 SUV
Indexed as
Identifiers
40261572What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.