ReviewCellular oncology (Dordrecht, Netherlands)2025
State of the art in CAR-based therapy: In vivo CAR production as a revolution in cell-based cancer treatment.
Review in Cellular oncology (Dordrecht, Netherlands), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Next generation approaches in cancer immunotherapy targeting mechanisms beyond PD1 and PDL1.Discover oncology · 2026Review
- RNA-Based Therapeutic Strategies in Multiple Myeloma: From Molecular Targets to Delivery and Clinical Translation.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Overcoming Immune Barriers in Allogeneic CAR-NK Therapy: From Multiplex Gene Editing to AI-Driven Precision Design.Biomolecules · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) therapy has successfully treated relapsed/refractory hematological cancers. This strategy can effectively target tumor cells. However, despite positive outcomes in clinical applications, challenges remain to overcome. These hurdles pertain to the production of the drugs, solid tumor resistance, and side effects related to the treatment. Some cases have been missed during the drug preparation due to manufacturing issues, prolonged production times, and high costs. These challenges mainly arise from the in vitro manufacturing process, so reevaluating this process could minimize the number of missed patients. The immune cells are traditionally collected and sent to the laboratory; after several steps, the cells are modified to express the CAR gene before being injected back into the patient's body. During the in vivo method, the CAR gene is introduced to the immune cells inside the body. This allows for treatment to begin sooner, avoiding potential failures in drug preparation and the associated high costs. In this review, we will elaborate on the production and treatment process using in vivo CAR, examine the benefits and challenges of this approach, and ultimately present the available solutions for incorporating this treatment into clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.