Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40261552›Full record

ReviewMedicine, health care, and philosophy2025

Understanding "interests": historical insights for managing conflicts of interest in healthcare and biomedical science.

Miriam Wiersma, Ian Kerridge, Wendy Lipworth

Abstract readHistorical ArticleReview
In one paragraph

Review in Medicine, health care, and philosophy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Miriam WiersmaFaculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney School of Public Health, Sydney Health Ethics, The University of Sydney, Rm 134, Edward Ford Building A27, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia. miriam.wiersma@sydney.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3739-3090
Ian KerridgeHaematology Department, Royal North Shore Hospital, Reserve Road, St Leonards, Sydney, NSW, 2065, Australia.
Wendy LipworthEthics and Agency Research Centre, Macquarie University, 75 Talavera Rd, Macquarie Park, NSW, 2109, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Conflicts of interest are widely regarded as being morally, socially, and scientifically problematic in the many sectors, including in the health sector. There has been considerable attention paid to managing conflicts of interest in clinical practice, medical research and health policy through strategies such as recusal, disinvestment, and disclosure. While these efforts have been important, they are often based on a superficial account of "interests", as few in healthcare and biomedical science have sought to unpack the concept. In this paper, we argue that adopting an historically and philosophically informed account of interests can enrich our thinking about COI in healthcare and biomedical science, and lead to the improvement of COI management strategies. To support this claim, we first provide an overview of contemporary debates about COI in these domains. We then summarise the historical trajectory of the concept of "interest" and show how these insights can be used to inform the management of COI in healthcare and biomedical science using the example of physicians' relationships with the pharmaceutical industry. In particular, we challenge assumed hierarchies of interests and call for increased attention to the multiplicities of interests, both financial and non-financial, that may at times converge and conflict.

Indexed as

Biomedical ResearchConflict of InterestDelivery of Health CareDisclosureDrug IndustryHistory, 20th CenturyHumansPhilosophy, MedicalConflict of interestInterestMedicinePharmaceutical industry

Identifiers

PMID40261552
PMCPMC12380924

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.