Trial reportAIDS and behavior2025
Acceptability, Feasibility, and Preliminary Efficacy of Schools Championing Safe South Africa, a Social Norms Intervention to Prevent HIV Risk Behavior and Perpetration of Intimate Partner Violence Among Teenage Boys.
Trial report in AIDS and behavior, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Schools Championing Safe South Africa is an intervention to prevent sexual violence perpetration and HIV/STI risk behavior among teenage boys, focusing on correcting misperceived social norms regarding risk behavior and engaging boys, teachers and peers in school. We tested its acceptability, feasibility, and preliminary efficacy in a pilot RCT (N = 282). 99% of intervention boys reported high satisfaction with content, format, and delivery. There was good facilitator fidelity to the manualized protocol and 99% retention at 6-month follow-up. Among intervention boys, completed acts of any sexual violence perpetration (touching, oral, anal, and/or vaginal sex) decreased from 71% (95% CI: 61%, 80%) at baseline to 55% (95% CI: 44%, 66%) at 1 month follow-up, with a percentage difference of 15% (95% CI: 4%, 26%; p = 0.004). At 6 months, change was not significant (72-68%; p = 0.353). For the intervention group, attempted acts of any sexual violence perpetration reduced from 49% (95% CI: 40%, 58%) at baseline to 25% (95% CI: 17%, 33%) at 1 month, with a percentage difference of 22% (95% CI: 11%, 32%; p < 0.001) but was not sustained at 6 months (47-43%; p = 0.446). Across timepoints, the control group did not show significant changes in completed or attempted perpetration. There were no significant changes in condom use in the intervention or control groups. Behavioral signals of positive change for prevention of sexual violence perpetration combined with high acceptability and feasibility indicate that the intervention should be tested further for efficacy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.