Observational studyEmergency radiology2025
Point-of-care lung ultrasound - a rapid and reliable diagnostic tool for emergency physicians treating patients with acute dyspnea in high-volume emergency departments.
Observational study in Emergency radiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Accuracy of lung ultrasound in the diagnosis of acute respiratory distress syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie · 2026Article
- An Integrated Prehospital Point-of-Care Lung Ultrasound Protocol for Patients With Dyspnea.Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine · 2026Article
- Assessment of an Ultrasonography-Based Algorithm for Detecting the Causes of Acute Dyspnea in an Emergency Hospital.Medeniyet medical journal · 2026Article
- Pre-hospital and emergency department point-of-care ultrasound in cardiovascular emergencies: a scoping review.Cardiovascular diagnosis and therapy · 2026Review
- Lung Ultrasound Offers Fast and Reliable Exclusion of Heart Failure in the Emergency Department: A Prospective Diagnostic Study.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeAcute dyspnea is a common presenting symptom in the Emergency Department (ED). The study aims to assess the concordance between emergency physician diagnosis (i.e., initial rapid assessment at ED admission including point-of-care lung ultrasound - PoC-LUS) and attending physician diagnosis (i.e., hospital admission diagnosis which also includes CT scans) in patients presenting with dyspnea.
methodWe performed a prospective pilot observational study in the ED of tertiary care university hospital between 31.01.2022 and 03.09.2024. We included dyspneic patients presented when the physician involved in the study was on call.
resultsA total of 103 patients were included (mean age, 70±16.1 years). An excellent agreement was found between emergency physician and attending physician diagnosis for all etiologies of dyspnea: pleural effusion (Cohen's kappa coefficient 1 for bilateral, 0.844 for right, 0.790 for left pleural effusion), pneumonia (κ = 0.979 for right, κ = 0.930 for left pneumonia), bronchopneumonia (κ = 0.912), acute pulmonary edema (κ = 1), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbation (κ = 0.904), pleuropulmonary tumors (k = 0.884), acute respiratory distress syndrome - ARDS (κ = 1), (p < 0.001 for all). The median(±SD) time needed to complete the emergency physician diagnosis was 16(±4) minutes and the median(±SD) time needed to complete the attending physician diagnosis was 480(±112) minutes.
conclusionIn patients presenting in the ED with dyspnea, PoC-LUS guided emergency physician diagnosis has a very good diagnosis performance. The time needed to complete the emergency physician diagnosis is much lower than the time needed to complete the attending physician diagnosis. Given its availability, PoC-LUS is a useful tool for the assessment of patients presenting with dyspnea.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.