Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40261500›Full record

Observational studyEmergency radiology2025

Point-of-care lung ultrasound - a rapid and reliable diagnostic tool for emergency physicians treating patients with acute dyspnea in high-volume emergency departments.

Irina Ciumanghel, Eliza Barbuta, Adi-Ionut Ciumanghel, Iulian Buzincu, Gabriela Grigorasi, Diana Cimpoesu

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Emergency radiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. An Integrated Prehospital Point-of-Care Lung Ultrasound Protocol for Patients With Dyspnea.Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Irina Ciumanghel *University of Medicine and Pharmacy "Gr. T. Popa" Iasi, Iași, Romania.
Eliza Barbuta *University of Medicine and Pharmacy "Gr. T. Popa" Iasi, Iași, Romania.
Adi-Ionut CiumanghelUniversity of Medicine and Pharmacy "Gr. T. Popa" Iasi, Iași, Romania. adi.ciumanghel@yahoo.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5457-6636
Iulian BuzincuUniversity of Medicine and Pharmacy "Gr. T. Popa" Iasi, Iași, Romania.
Gabriela GrigorasiUniversity of Medicine and Pharmacy "Gr. T. Popa" Iasi, Iași, Romania.
Diana CimpoesuUniversity of Medicine and Pharmacy "Gr. T. Popa" Iasi, Iași, Romania.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAcute dyspnea is a common presenting symptom in the Emergency Department (ED). The study aims to assess the concordance between emergency physician diagnosis (i.e., initial rapid assessment at ED admission including point-of-care lung ultrasound - PoC-LUS) and attending physician diagnosis (i.e., hospital admission diagnosis which also includes CT scans) in patients presenting with dyspnea.

methodWe performed a prospective pilot observational study in the ED of tertiary care university hospital between 31.01.2022 and 03.09.2024. We included dyspneic patients presented when the physician involved in the study was on call.

resultsA total of 103 patients were included (mean age, 70±16.1 years). An excellent agreement was found between emergency physician and attending physician diagnosis for all etiologies of dyspnea: pleural effusion (Cohen's kappa coefficient 1 for bilateral, 0.844 for right, 0.790 for left pleural effusion), pneumonia (κ = 0.979 for right, κ = 0.930 for left pneumonia), bronchopneumonia (κ = 0.912), acute pulmonary edema (κ = 1), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbation (κ = 0.904), pleuropulmonary tumors (k = 0.884), acute respiratory distress syndrome - ARDS (κ = 1), (p < 0.001 for all). The median(±SD) time needed to complete the emergency physician diagnosis was 16(±4) minutes and the median(±SD) time needed to complete the attending physician diagnosis was 480(±112) minutes.

conclusionIn patients presenting in the ED with dyspnea, PoC-LUS guided emergency physician diagnosis has a very good diagnosis performance. The time needed to complete the emergency physician diagnosis is much lower than the time needed to complete the attending physician diagnosis. Given its availability, PoC-LUS is a useful tool for the assessment of patients presenting with dyspnea.

Indexed as

DyspneaEmergency Service, HospitalLung DiseasesPoint-of-Care SystemsAcute DiseaseAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPilot ProjectsProspective StudiesUltrasonographyAcute dyspneaEmergency physicianLung ultrasoundPoint-of-care lung ultrasound

Identifiers

PMID40261500
PMCPMC12134022

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.