ArticleClinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico2025
Monitoring of the oncological process for lung cancer in Spain: an expert consensus report.
Article in Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Recommendations for the development of an integrated lung cancer care process: an expert consensus report.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026Article
- Real-World Insights into Stage I-III Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer in Spain in the Pre-Immunotherapy Era Using AI Techniques: The IntellyLUNG Study.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionContinuous monitoring of the oncological process is essential for identifying inefficiencies and areas of improvement, enabling better resource allocation in the care of lung cancer patients.
objectiveThe objective is to define key indicators and identify critical variables for monitoring lung cancer care, aiming to improve early detection, reduce delays in diagnosis and treatment, and enhance biomarker research, ensuring timely and effective treatments for all patients.
methodsA multidisciplinary expert group conducted a consensus process based on a review of national guidelines and initiatives related to lung cancer care. The experts defined relevant indicators and identified variables for monitoring overall care, addressing delays, and improving biomarker research. The feasibility of incorporating these indicators into existing information systems was also assessed.
resultsThe proposed indicators provide a structured approach for assessing lung cancer care and outcomes. Their inclusion in healthcare information systems would improve the monitoring and evaluation of care quality and patient outcomes. Additionally, these indicators would also promote interoperability and continuous patient care across different centers and regions, allowing informed decision-making in the improvement of healthcare processes by those responsible for healthcare management.
conclusionsThe adoption of standardized indicators for lung cancer care monitoring can drive continuous improvement in healthcare processes. Implementing these indicators in information systems will enable better resource allocation, timely and effective treatment, and enhanced coordination among healthcare providers, ultimately improving patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.