Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40261391›Full record

ArticleEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2025

A multimodal machine learning model integrating clinical and MRI data for predicting neurological outcomes following surgical treatment for cervical spinal cord injury.

Tomoaki Shimizu, Kento Inomata, Kota Suda, Satoko Matsumoto Harmon, Miki Komatsu, Masahiro Ota, Hiroki Ushirozako, Akio Minami, Satoshi Maki, Tsutomu Endo and 5 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Spinal morphology-based multimodal AI for predicting pulmonary dysfunction in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Tomoaki ShimizuHokkaido Spinal Cord Injury Center, Hokkaido, Japan. tomoaki.shimizu.96@gmail.com.
Kento InomataHokkaido Spinal Cord Injury Center, Hokkaido, Japan.
Kota SudaHokkaido Spinal Cord Injury Center, Hokkaido, Japan.
Satoko Matsumoto HarmonHokkaido Spinal Cord Injury Center, Hokkaido, Japan.
Miki KomatsuHokkaido Spinal Cord Injury Center, Hokkaido, Japan.
Masahiro OtaHokkaido Spinal Cord Injury Center, Hokkaido, Japan.
Hiroki UshirozakoHokkaido Spinal Cord Injury Center, Hokkaido, Japan.
Akio MinamiHokkaido Spinal Cord Injury Center, Hokkaido, Japan.
Satoshi MakiChiba University, Chiba, Japan.
Tsutomu EndoHokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan.
Katsuhisa YamadaHokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan.
Norimasa IwasakiHokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan.
Hiroshi TakahashiUniversity of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan.
Masashi YamazakiUniversity of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan.
Masao KodaUniversity of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan.

Funding

CSP VA 573
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposePredicting the prognosis of cervical spinal cord injury (CSCI) is crucial for patients and healthcare providers, as it informs treatment decisions and rehabilitation planning. This study aimed to develop a multimodal machine learning model integrating clinical and MRI data to predict neurological outcomes in CSCI patients.

methodsWe conducted a retrospective study of 247 patients with traumatic CSCI who underwent posterior decompression and fusion surgery at a specialized spinal cord injury center between April 2015 and June 2021. Clinical data, including demographics, comorbidities, laboratory data, and neurological findings, were collected. T2-weighted sagittal MRI images were analyzed using a convolutional neural network pre-trained on RadImageNet. Clinical and MRI features were integrated to construct a multimodal predictive model using the Light Gradient Boosting Machine algorithm, validated with 5-fold cross-validation. The primary outcome was defined as achieving American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) Impairment Scale (AIS) grade D or higher at 6 months post-injury. Shapley Additive Explanations identified key contributing factors in predicting these neurological outcomes.

resultsThe model achieved an accuracy of 0.90 and an AUC of 0.94 for predicting recovery to AIS grade D or higher at 6 months post-injury. Key predictors included lower extremity ASIA motor score (AMS), AIS grade at admission, upper extremity AMS, age, HbA1c, and MRI-derived features.

conclusionThis multimodal model demonstrated superior predictive accuracy compared to previous monomodal approaches, emphasizing the value of combining clinical and MRI data. These findings highlight the potential of multimodal predictive models in improving clinical decision-making and outcomes for CSCI patients.

Indexed as

Cervical CordCervical VertebraeMachine LearningMagnetic Resonance ImagingSpinal Cord InjuriesAdultAgedDecompression, SurgicalFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisRetrospective StudiesSpinal FusionTreatment OutcomeCervical spinal cord injuryDeep learningMachine learningMultimodal prediction modelNeurological outcomes

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.