Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40261385›Full record

ArticleIntensive care medicine2025

Identification and validation of robust hospital-acquired pneumonia subphenotypes associated with all-cause mortality: a multi-cohort derivation and validation.

Florian Pierre Martin, Cécile Poulain, Jelle Haitsma Mulier, Ana Motos, Victor Gourain, Ismaël Ogan, Emmanuel Montassier, Yoann Launey, Sigismond Lasocki, Raphaël Cinotti and 8 more

Abstract readValidation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Intensive care medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Florian Pierre Martin *Inserm, CHU Nantes, Center for Research in Transplantation and Translational Immunology, UMR 1064, Nantes Université, Nantes, France.
Cécile Poulain *Inserm, CHU Nantes, Center for Research in Transplantation and Translational Immunology, UMR 1064, Nantes Université, Nantes, France.
Jelle Haitsma MulierDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Ana MotosInserm, CHU Nantes, Center for Research in Transplantation and Translational Immunology, UMR 1064, Nantes Université, Nantes, France.
Victor GourainInserm, CHU Nantes, Center for Research in Transplantation and Translational Immunology, UMR 1064, Nantes Université, Nantes, France.
Ismaël OganService d'Anesthesie Réanimation, Institut de Recherche en Santé 2 Nantes Biotech, Nantes Université, CHU Nantes, Nantes, France.
Emmanuel MontassierInserm, CHU Nantes, Center for Research in Transplantation and Translational Immunology, UMR 1064, Nantes Université, Nantes, France.
Yoann LauneyReanimation, CHU Rennes, Rennes, France.
Sigismond LasockiReanimation, CHU Angers, Angers, France.
Raphaël CinottiService d'Anesthesie Réanimation, Institut de Recherche en Santé 2 Nantes Biotech, Nantes Université, CHU Nantes, Nantes, France.
Claire Dahyot FizelierINSERM U1070, PHAR2, CHU de Poitiers, Université de Poitiers, Poitiers, France.
Otavio RanzaniInstitut de Recerca Sant Pau (IR SANTPAU), Barcelona, Spain.
Luis Felipe ReyesUnisabana Center for Translational Science, School of Medicine, Universidad de La Sabana, Chia, Colombia.
Ignacio Martin-LoechesDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Multidisciplinary Intensive Care Research Organization (MICRO), St. James' Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
Lennie DerdeDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Antoni TorresServei de Pneumologia Hospital Clinic Fundació Clinic IDIBAPS, ICREA, CIBERES, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Olaf CremerDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Antoine RoquillyInserm, CHU Nantes, Center for Research in Transplantation and Translational Immunology, UMR 1064, Nantes Université, Nantes, France. antoine.roquilly@univ-nantes.fr.ORCID 0000-0002-1029-6242

Funding

Horizon 2020 Framework Programme 847782 (HAP2 project).
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeDespite optimal antimicrobial therapy, the treatment failure rate of hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP) routinely reaches 40% in critically ill patients. Subphenotypes have been identified within sepsis and acute respiratory distress syndrome with important predictive and possibly therapeutic implications. We derived prognosis subphenotypes for HAP and explored whether they were associated with biological markers and response to treatment.

methodsWe separately analysed data from four cohorts of critically ill patients in France (PNEUMOCARE, n = 511, ATLANREA, n = 401), Netherlands (MARS, n = 1351) and Europe-South America (ENIRRI, n = 900) to investigate HAP heterogeneity using unsupervised clustering based on clinical and routine biological variables available at HAP diagnosis. Then, we developed a machine learning-based workflow to create a simplified classification model using discovery data sets. This model was validated by applying it to an independent replication data set from an international randomized clinical trial comparing linezolid and tedizolid for the treatment of HAP (VITAL, n = 726 patients). The primary outcome was the association of subphenotypes with 28-day all-cause mortality. Secondary analyses included subphenotype associations with treatment failure at test-of-cure, respiratory microbiome and cytokine profiles in the ATLANREA subgroup, and treatment response in the VITAL trial.

resultsWe tested twelve metrics and determined that a two-cluster model best fits all cohorts. HAP subphenotype 2 had greater disease severity, lower body temperature, and worse PaO2/FiO2 ratio than subphenotype 1 patients. Although the prevalence of subphenotype 2 ranged from 26.9 to 66.9% across the four derivation cohorts, the rates of 28-day mortality and treatment failure at test-of-cure were consistently higher to subphenotype 1 (p < 0.01 for all comparisons). Subphenotype 2 was associated with greater respiratory microbiome dysbiosis and higher levels of proinflammatory cytokines in the ATLANREA cohort, as well as with statistically significant tedizolid effect modification in the VITAL trial (Relative Risk of treatment failure with tedizolid = 1.52; 95% CI 1.12-2.06 in subphenotype 1 vs. = 0.98; 95% CI 0.7-1.38 in subphenotype 2).

conclusionsWe identified two robust clinical subphenotypes by extensively analyzing HAP data sets. Their associations with respiratory microbiome composition, systemic inflammation, and treatment efficacy in independent data sets highlight their potential for prognostic value and predictive enrichment in future clinical trials aimed at personalized therapies.

Indexed as

Healthcare-Associated PneumoniaAgedAnti-Bacterial AgentsCohort StudiesCritical IllnessFemaleFranceHumansMachine LearningMaleMiddle AgedNetherlandsPhenotypePrognosisAnti-Bacterial AgentsAntimicrobial therapyHospital-acquired pneumoniaLung microbiomeMachine learningMortalitySubphenotype

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.