ArticleIntensive care medicine2025
Identification and validation of robust hospital-acquired pneumonia subphenotypes associated with all-cause mortality: a multi-cohort derivation and validation.
Article in Intensive care medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- From Sentiment to Signal: Narrative-Physiology Discordance as a Testable Target for Artificial Intelligence in Critical Care.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Advances in ventilator-associated pneumonia: from pathophysiology to precision management.Intensive care medicine · 2026Article
- Identification of a robust metabolic signature associated with hospital-acquired pneumonia and response to interferon-gamma treatment in critically ill patients.Critical care (London, England) · 2026Observational
- A clinically interpretable prediction model for acute mortality in patients with pneumonia requiring mechanical ventilation.Respiratory research · 2026Article
- Real-life impact of clinical metagenomics in the intensive care unit: a multicenter retrospective study in greater paris area hospitals.Critical care (London, England) · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence- and Machine Learning-Assisted Subphenotyping for Personalized Immunotherapy in Sepsis.Journal of personalized medicine · 2026Review
- Development and multi-database validation of interpretable machine learning models for predicting In-Hospital mortality in pneumonia patients: A comprehensive analysis across four healthcare systems.Respiratory research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeDespite optimal antimicrobial therapy, the treatment failure rate of hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP) routinely reaches 40% in critically ill patients. Subphenotypes have been identified within sepsis and acute respiratory distress syndrome with important predictive and possibly therapeutic implications. We derived prognosis subphenotypes for HAP and explored whether they were associated with biological markers and response to treatment.
methodsWe separately analysed data from four cohorts of critically ill patients in France (PNEUMOCARE, n = 511, ATLANREA, n = 401), Netherlands (MARS, n = 1351) and Europe-South America (ENIRRI, n = 900) to investigate HAP heterogeneity using unsupervised clustering based on clinical and routine biological variables available at HAP diagnosis. Then, we developed a machine learning-based workflow to create a simplified classification model using discovery data sets. This model was validated by applying it to an independent replication data set from an international randomized clinical trial comparing linezolid and tedizolid for the treatment of HAP (VITAL, n = 726 patients). The primary outcome was the association of subphenotypes with 28-day all-cause mortality. Secondary analyses included subphenotype associations with treatment failure at test-of-cure, respiratory microbiome and cytokine profiles in the ATLANREA subgroup, and treatment response in the VITAL trial.
resultsWe tested twelve metrics and determined that a two-cluster model best fits all cohorts. HAP subphenotype 2 had greater disease severity, lower body temperature, and worse PaO2/FiO2 ratio than subphenotype 1 patients. Although the prevalence of subphenotype 2 ranged from 26.9 to 66.9% across the four derivation cohorts, the rates of 28-day mortality and treatment failure at test-of-cure were consistently higher to subphenotype 1 (p < 0.01 for all comparisons). Subphenotype 2 was associated with greater respiratory microbiome dysbiosis and higher levels of proinflammatory cytokines in the ATLANREA cohort, as well as with statistically significant tedizolid effect modification in the VITAL trial (Relative Risk of treatment failure with tedizolid = 1.52; 95% CI 1.12-2.06 in subphenotype 1 vs. = 0.98; 95% CI 0.7-1.38 in subphenotype 2).
conclusionsWe identified two robust clinical subphenotypes by extensively analyzing HAP data sets. Their associations with respiratory microbiome composition, systemic inflammation, and treatment efficacy in independent data sets highlight their potential for prognostic value and predictive enrichment in future clinical trials aimed at personalized therapies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40261385What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.