ArticleIntensive care medicine2025
Outcomes in immunocompromised patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure treated by high-flow nasal oxygen.
Article in Intensive care medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS): epidemiology, etiology, molecular mechanisms, diagnosis and therapeutic strategies.Molecular biomedicine · 2026Review
- Critical care in hematologic emergencies.Intensive care medicine · 2026Article
- Performance of the Ventilatory Ratio to Predict Intubation in Patients With COVID-19 Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome.Critical care explorations · 2026Article
- Update on acute respiratory failure.Intensive care medicine · 2026Article
- Immunosuppressive treatment in solid organ transplant critically ill patients: still an unanswered question?Intensive care medicine · 2026Article
- High-flow nasal-cannula oxygen therapy in intensive-care-unit patients: a prospective multicenter observational cohort study (OHE-REA).Scientific reports · 2026Observational
- Severe community-acquired pneumonia: an integral approach.Journal of intensive care · 2026Review
- The impact of the timing of mNGS-guided antibiotic adjustment on clinical outcomes in ICU patients with severe community-acquired pneumonia: a retrospective study.Annals of clinical microbiology and antimicrobials · 2026Article
- Comorbidities in extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: a comorbidome-based analysis.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Respiratory management of critically ill pneumocystis pneumonia patients: a multicenter retrospective study.Annals of intensive care · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeAcute hypoxemic respiratory failure (ARF) is a major challenge in immunocompromised patients, often complicated by severe respiratory distress and organ dysfunction. High-flow nasal oxygen (HFNO) therapy is the standard of care, but data on its effectiveness and outcomes are limited. This study evaluated the outcomes of HFNO in this population, predictors of invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV), and factors associated with 28-day mortality.
methodsWe analyzed data from a multicenter cohort of 986 immunocompromised patients with ARF treated with HFNO. Predictive factors for IMV and mortality were assessed using multivariable survival models, and the predictive value of the respiratory rate‑oxygenation (ROX) index for IMV was evaluated.
resultsPatients had a median age of 63 years [IQR 54-70], and 66% were male. Primary causes of immunosuppression included hematologic malignancies (55%), solid tumors (30%), and solid-organ transplantation (10%). Bacterial pneumonia (40%) and opportunistic infections (15%) were the most common ARF etiologies. IMV was required in 46% of patients. Day 28 mortality was 33%, with better outcomes for solid-organ transplant recipients compared to hematologic malignancy or solid tumor (70% vs. 48% vs. 51% mortality, respectively). Predictors of IMV included a lower ROX index, higher respiratory rates, and lower PaO
conclusionsHFNO outcomes in immunocompromised patients with ARF vary widely, influenced by immunosuppression type, ARF etiology, and clinical factors. Optimizing treatment and identifying high-risk patients could improve outcomes. Prospective studies are needed to enhance HFNO strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40261380What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.