ArticleArchives of gynecology and obstetrics2025
Disordered eating and body dissatisfaction in women with non-natural menopause.
Article in Archives of gynecology and obstetrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveResearch on menopause and eating behavior has mostly focused on women with premenopausal, perimenopausal, and natural postmenopausal stages. The aim of this study was to investigate eating behavior and body image in women with non-natural menopause.
methodsThe sample included 330 postmenopausal women, classified as non-natural menopause (NNMP) (N = 103) due to gynecological surgery (oophorectomy/hysterectomy) and natural menopause (NMP) (N = 227) who completed an anonymous questionnaire on current health, weight history, eating behavior including eating disorder symptoms (EDS) and body image. We compared women with NNMP and NMP and in a subanalysis, women with oophorectomy and hysterectomy using various logistic regression models.
resultsNNMP women were similar in most demographic characteristics to NMP women except younger age, higher maximum BMI, more mental illnesses, restrictive dieting, and EDS. The group difference in EDS disappeared after adjustment for confounders. Our subanalysis of oophorectomized women showed a significantly higher prevalence of EDS (29%) compared to hysterectomized women (11%) (p = 0.017), even after adjustment for confounders, and a significantly more pronounced body weight dependence of their self-esteem. Body satisfaction was below 50% in all groups.
conclusionWomen who have undergone oophorectomy appear to be highly susceptible for EDS compared to those with natural menopause, unlike hysterectomized women, whose menopausal transition is less abrupt. While body image was generally moderate to negative across all groups, oophorectomized women showed a stronger focus on weight-related self-esteem. Incorporating eating behavior into clinical care is crucial, especially for women post-oophorectomy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.