ArticleHNO2026
[Medical tumor therapy for head and neck cancer: between standardization and personalization].
Article in HNO, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In the field of systemic cancer therapy for head and neck neoplasms, new approvals have led to several changes in treatment standards, primarily in the palliative situation. At the same time, molecular biomarkers have been established that can contribute to therapeutic decision-making in addition to clinical factors. These developments are summarized, and potential strategies to resolve the tension between standardization and personalization are described. Results from randomized phase III studies with therapeutic antibodies targeting the PD1/PD-L1 axis in combination with definitive chemoradiation are described and discussed. Finally, inspired by the press release about the positive results of the neoadjuvant KEYNOTE-689 trial in locoregionally advanced resectable disease, potential measures and suggestions for integrating neoadjuvant immunotherapy into clinical routine are discussed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.