Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40261286›Full record

ArticleJournal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD2025

Resilient together for dementia: A qualitative study of couples' treatment preferences to address distress early after diagnosis.

Sarah M Bannon, Sydney McCage, Kristin Walker, Julie Brewer, Nina Ahmad, Talea Cornelius, Robert A Parker, Kristen Dams-O'Connor, Bradford Dickerson, Christine S Ritchie and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. A Feasibility Study of a Community-Based Program for Individuals Living With Dementia.Canadian journal of occupational therapy. Revue canadienne d'ergotherapie · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Sarah M BannonBrain Injury Research Center, Department of Rehabilitation and Human Performance, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5299-9432
Sydney McCageBrain Injury Research Center, Department of Rehabilitation and Human Performance, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.ORCID 0009-0006-4416-1860
Kristin WalkerDepartment of Psychology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0882-2159
Julie BrewerCenter for Health Outcomes and Interdisciplinary Research, Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5581-2434
Nina AhmadCenter for Health Outcomes and Interdisciplinary Research, Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7940-3408
Talea CorneliusDepartment of Medicine, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7181-0981
Robert A ParkerBiostatistics Center, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9666-5941
Kristen Dams-O'ConnorBrain Injury Research Center, Department of Rehabilitation and Human Performance, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2506-0216
Bradford DickersonFrontotemporal Disorders Unit, Departments of Neurology and Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5958-3445
Christine S RitchieMongan Institute Center for Aging and Serious Illness and the Division of Palliative Care and Geriatric Medicine, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4881-9416
Ana-Maria VranceanuCenter for Health Outcomes and Interdisciplinary Research, Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3994-6488

Funding

Recovering Together: Building resiliency in dyads of patients with an acute brain injury admitted to the Neuroscience Intensive Care Unit and their informal caregiversR01NR019982 · NINR · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI VRANCEANU, ANA-MARIA · 2021 to 2025
$3.3M
MassaChusetts General Hospital ROybal CeNter For BehavIoral Dyadic ResEarch in Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementias (CONFIDE-ADRD): Behavioral Intervention Development CoreP30AG086562 · NIA · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI OKEREKE, OLIVIA IFEOMA, VRANCEANU, ANA-MARIA · 2024 to 2025
$2.4M
Resilient Together for Dementia: A live video resiliency dyadic intervention for persons with dementia and their care-partners early afterdiagnosisK23AG075188 · NIA · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI Sarah Bannon · 2022 to 2026
$981k
Mentoring in technology enhanced mind body and lifestyle interventionsK24AT011760 · NCCIH · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI Ana-Maria Vranceanu · 2022 to 2026
$911k
NCCIH NIH HHS K24 AT011760NIA NIH HHS K23 AG075188NIA NIH HHS L30 AG079380NIA NIH HHS P30 AG086562NINR NIH HHS R01 NR019982
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BackgroundDespite technological advances and earlier and more confident diagnoses, there is a lack of post-diagnosis support for couples navigating the challenges of early dementia. Clinically elevated emotional distress is common for both partners after diagnosis, and interferes with the health, relationships, and adjustment of both partners if not addressed.ObjectiveOur objective was to gather in-depth information on couples' preferences to inform the development of a proposed dyadic intervention addressing emotional distress early (within 6 months) after one partners' receipt of a dementia diagnosis.MethodsWe recruited couples after a recent dementia diagnosis (N = 16 dyads; 32 participants) from a large academic medical center via direct provider referrals for 60-min virtual dyadic interviews. Data were analyzed using a hybrid inductive-deductive approach to thematic analysis.ResultsWe identified themes within 3 a-priori determined domains. For dyadic intervention format (domain 1), couples preferred to participate in sessions together and to have flexible options for telehealth and in-person participation. Preferences for intervention content (domain 2) included information on dementia, skills to reduce distress and promote resiliency, and support to communicate about the diagnosis and related stress. Barriers and facilitators (domain 3) included denial or hesitation, resource constraints, and interests in learning skills and connecting to others.ConclusionsWe gathered comprehensive information that could be used to adapt existing dyadic interventions and to tailor support to match couples' preferences early after dementia diagnoses. Early interventions should prioritize flexible delivery of information and skills to couples to support adaptive coping following dementia diagnoses.

Indexed as

DementiaPsychological DistressResilience, PsychologicalSpousesStress, PsychologicalAdaptation, PsychologicalAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedQualitative ResearchAlzheimer's diseasecouplesdementiadyadicinterventionresilience

Identifiers

PMID40261286
PMCPMC12281600

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.