ArticleStress and health : journal of the International Society for the Investigation of Stress2025
Using Machine Learning to Predict Uptake to an Online Self-Guided Intervention for Stress During the COVID-19 Pandemic.
Article in Stress and health : journal of the International Society for the Investigation of Stress, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Online self-guided interventions appear efficacious for alleviating some mental health concerns. However, among persons who are offered online interventions, only a fraction access them (i.e., achieve uptake). Machine learning methods may be useful to predict who will achieve uptake, which could inform improvements to interventions and their methods of delivery. We used secondary data from participants given access to a self-guided online stress intervention during the COVID-19 pandemic in a randomised trial (N = 301, among whom 158 achieved uptake). This study built and evaluated several models for predicting uptake. Putative predictors included demographic characteristics, mental health service utilization and interest, and mental health symptoms assessed before participants were provided access to the intervention. The best-performing model, a linear support vector machine model, had 70% accuracy and 0.70 area under the receiver operating characteristics curve in a held-out dataset, though these metrics were not significantly better than competitor models. Model inspection revealed that participants who reported interest in mental health treatment and lesbian, gay, bisexual, and other sexual minority participants were more likely to achieve uptake. Additionally, male participants were less likely to achieve uptake. The best-performing machine learning model achieved an acceptable level of performance in predicting uptake. Self-reported treatment interest was especially predictive of uptake. Future research should attempt to understand gender and sexual orientation differences in self-guided online mental health intervention uptake. Additionally, research should evaluate the utility of machine learning to inform targeted motivational enhancement of those less likely to achieve uptake.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.