Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40261216›Full record

ReviewNanomedicine (London, England)2025

Emerging nanoparticle-based x-ray imaging contrast agents for breast cancer screening.

Katherine J Mossburg, Diego Barragan, Nathaniel H O, Andrea C Kian, Andrew D A Maidment, David P Cormode

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nanomedicine (London, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Katherine J MossburgDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Diego BarraganDepartment of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Nathaniel H ODepartment of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Andrea C KianDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Andrew D A MaidmentDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
David P CormodeDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.

Funding

SUMMER UNDERGRADUATE PROGRAM TO EDUCATE RADIATION SCIENTISTS (SUPERS)R25CA140116 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI JAY FITZGERALD DORSEY · 2010 to 2026
$4.1M
Nanoparticle contrast agents for earlier breast cancer detectionR01CA227142 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI CORMODE, DAVID PETER · 2018 to 2022
$2.5M
Silver Telluride Nanoparticle Dual-Energy Mammography Contrast Agents For Breast Cancer ScreeningR01CA291880 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI David Peter Cormode · 2025 to 2026
$1.2M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA227142NCI NIH HHS R01 CA291880NCI NIH HHS R25 CA140116
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Breast cancer is one of the most common types of cancer, however, preventive screening has contributed to a significant reduction in mortality over the past four decades. The first-line screening methods for breast cancer, such as mammography and tomosynthesis, are x-ray-based modalities. Unfortunately, their cancer detection rates are low in patients with dense breasts. These, and other high-risk women, are now encouraged to receive supplemental screening. The supplemental imaging methods are diverse, including ultrasound, MRI, nuclear imaging, and X-ray-based modalities such as breast CT and contrast-enhanced mammography/tomosynthesis. Due to their low cost and wide availability, x-ray-based modalities see significant clinical use worldwide. These techniques benefit from the use of contrast agents, which are currently iodinated small molecules designed for other purposes. Consequently, developing new contrast agents that are specifically for breast cancer screening is of interest. This review describes these modalities and the nanoparticle-based contrast agents being researched for their enhanced performance. The relevant parameters for nanoparticle-based contrast agent design are evaluated, including contrast generation and potential biointeractions. Iodinated agents are discussed for comparison. Nanoparticles covered include silver sulfide, silver telluride, gold, and bismuth sulfide-based agents, among others. Finally, perspectives on future developments in this field are offered.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsContrast MediaEarly Detection of CancerNanoparticlesFemaleHumansMammographyTomography, X-Ray ComputedContrast MediaBreast cancer screeningcomputed tomographycontrast agentscontrast-enhanced mammographymammographynanoparticlesx-ray attenuation

Identifiers

PMID40261216
PMCPMC12068350

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.