ReviewInnovations (Philadelphia, Pa.)
State-of-the-Art Review: Advantages and Disadvantages of Femoral Versus Central Cannulation.
Review in Innovations (Philadelphia, Pa.). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Percutaneous, High-Flow, Hyperthermic Isolated Limb Perfusion Technique for Extremity Malignancies: Point of Technique.Journal of surgical oncology · 2026Article
- Central Aortic Cannulation in Minimally Invasive Cardiac Surgery via Right Thoracotomy: A Single-Center Retrospective Comparison.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Central Aortic Cannulation for Total Coronary Revascularization via Anterior Thoracotomy: A Single-Center Initial Experience.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2026Article
- Postoperative lactate trajectories predict in-hospital adverse outcomes and differ by surgical approach in cardiac surgery: a propensity score-matched study.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
- Minimally Invasive versus Complete Sternotomy for Reimplantation Valve-Sparing Aortic Root Replacement: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of chest surgery · 2025Review
- Cardiac arrest during peri-anesthetic systemic induction and maintenance in valvular heart disease: proceed or abandon? Clinical validation of a modified cardiopulmonary bypass strategy in 21 patients.European journal of medical research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The choice of cannulation technique for cardiopulmonary bypass remains a critical decision in cardiac surgery with direct consequences for intraoperative management and patient outcomes. Central and femoral cannulation represent the 2 dominant approaches, each associated with unique anatomical considerations, hemodynamic implications, and perioperative risks. The correct selection of a cannulation strategy should limit the risk of embolic events and associated complications such as vascular injury and stroke. The purpose of this review is to provide a detailed comparison of central and femoral cannulation techniques, with an emphasis on clinical scenarios and outcomes, recent innovations, and state-of-the-art technology. By critically analyzing current evidence, we aim to offer insights into the optimal cannulation strategy tailored to specific patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.