Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40261086›Full record

ArticleAnnals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine2025

Attitudes regarding polygenic risk testing for lung cancer: a mixed-methods study.

Hoda Badr, Jinyoung Byun, Melinda C Aldrich, Laura J Bierut, Li-Shiun Chen, Rayjean J Hung, Christopher I Amos

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Hoda BadrDepartment of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-4549-9111
Jinyoung ByunDepartment of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, United States.
Melinda C AldrichDivision of Genetic Medicine, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, United States.
Laura J BierutDepartment of Psychiatry, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, United States.
Li-Shiun ChenDepartment of Psychiatry, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, United States.
Rayjean J HungProsserman Centre for Population Health Research, Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, Toronto, Canada.
Christopher I AmosDepartment of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, United States.

Funding

Translating Molecular and Clinical Data to Population Lung Cancer Risk AssessmentU19CA203654 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO HEALTH SCIS CTR · PI Mattias Alexander Johansson · 2017 to 2026
$23.7M
A multilevel intervention to personalize and improve tobacco treatment in primary careR01DA056050 · NIDA · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI Li-Shiun Chen, Alex Taylor Ramsey · 2022 to 2026
$3.5M
Precision prevention strategy to increase uptake and engagement in lung cancer screening and smoking cessation treatmentR01CA268030 · NCI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI Li-Shiun Chen, Alex Taylor Ramsey · 2022 to 2026
$3.3M
Heterogeneous Genetic Architecture in Lung Cancer RiskR03CA277197 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO HEALTH SCIS CTR · PI BYUN, JINYOUNG · 2024 to 2025
$156k
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA268030NCI NIH HHS R03 CA277197NCI NIH HHS U19 CA203654NCI NIH HHS U19 CA203654-SNIDA NIH HHS R01 DA056050
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPolygenic risk scores (PRS) hold promise for early lung cancer detection and personalized treatment, yet factors influencing patient interest in PRS-based genetic testing are not well understood. PURPOSE: Grounded in the health belief model, this mixed-methods study explored knowledge, attitudes, perceived benefits and barriers to lung cancer PRS, and preferences for receiving PRS results.

resultsThe study included 141 individuals (41% African American, 63% female) recruited from two hospital affiliates of a comprehensive cancer center in the Southwestern United States. Although participants recognized the severity of lung cancer, knowledge of PRS was limited. Concerns about privacy, psychological impacts, and uncertainty about result usefulness diminished interest in genetic testing for polygenic risk. Significant differences (P < .05) in attitudes were observed: women expressed heightened concerns about psychological effects, and African Americans reported greater perceptions of stigma and concerns about potential familial consequences. Qualitative findings emphasized the psychological burden of learning one's genetic risk, particularly among those with family cancer histories or smoking exposure. Participants emphasized the need for clear, actionable results and assurances of data privacy.

conclusionsPerceived benefits and barriers to PRS-based testing varied by sociodemographic and personal risk factors, with concerns about stigma, psychological burden, and privacy shaping attitudes. Given participants' emphasis on clear, actionable results, strategies to enhance uptake should improve risk communication, ensure data privacy, and provide guidance on risk-reducing actions. Tailored approaches addressing subgroup-specific concerns may improve diverse patient engagement and equitable access to PRS.

Indexed as

Genetic Predisposition to DiseaseGenetic TestingHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeLung NeoplasmsMultifactorial InheritanceAdultAgedBlack or African AmericanFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedWhiteattitudeshealth belief modellung cancerpolygenic risk

Identifiers

PMID40261086
PMCPMC12012679

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.