ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2025
Automated whole genome sequencing platform for bacterial strain typing in clinical microbiology laboratories.
Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Nanopore sequencing in suitcase lab enables improved detection ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2026Article
- Comparison of core genome multi-locus sequencing typing pipelines for hospital outbreak detection of common bacterial pathogens.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Nosocomial outbreaks impact patient safety and place an economic burden on healthcare facilities. Laboratory testing plays a crucial role in outbreak investigation and guides containment efforts. In recent years, whole genome sequencing (WGS) methods have replaced traditional typing methods due to higher resolution and simplified workflows. Though an improvement from previous methods, bacterial WGS is time-consuming with manual DNA extraction and library preparation and long sequencing times for paired-end sequence data. Here, a fully automated library preparation and sequencing solution, the Clear Dx
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.