ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2025
Evaluation of long-read 16S rRNA next-generation sequencing for identification of bacterial isolates in a clinical diagnostic laboratory.
Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Rapid Exonuclease-Based De Novo Sequencing Strategy for Long Oligonucleotides via Liquid-Phase Ion Trap Coupled With Mass Spectrometry.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- Nordic Walking Combined with Time-Restricted Eating Is Associated with Changes in Gut Microbiota Composition in Adults with Obesity-Pilot Study.Nutrients · 2026Article
- When MALDI-TOF MS and 16S rRNA gene sequencing are not enough: identification ofASM case reports · 2026Article
- In Vitro, In Silico, and In Vivo Evaluation of Antiplasmodial Activity of Ursodeoxycholic Acid Following GNPS Dereplication of an ActivePharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Molecular diagnosis of sepsis in hospital patients: assessment of the Agata SepsisBMC infectious diseases · 2026Article
- A comprehensive review on bacterial endophytic secondary metabolites: a road map from crude extract to lead molecule production.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Review
- Validation of a long-read 16S rRNA-gene sequencing approach for analysis of clinical samples and bacterial identification in a routine clinical laboratory.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Article
- Oxford Nanopore Sequencing in pediatric emergency infectious diseases: from rapid diagnosis to precision medicine.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Sanger sequencing of the first ~500 bp of the 16S rRNA gene is frequently used to identify bacterial pathogens that have ambiguous biochemical profiles or proteomic mass spectra. When diversity does not occur within that region, genus-level and/or species-level identification may not be possible, and a longer sequence or alternative target may be required to distinguish between genera/species. In this study, we evaluated a clinically relevant end-to-end solution for long-read (~1,500 nt) 16S rRNA next-generation sequencing by Oxford Nanopore Technologies (ONT) compared to a ~500 nt Sanger sequencing approach for the identification of 153 bacterial clinical isolates. Sequencing data were analyzed using the IDNS software from SmartGene and its proprietary 16S Centroid reference database (Centroid database) SmartGene software and the Centroid database. The agreement of the two platforms on species- and genus-level identification was determined, and discrepancies were resolved by whole-genome sequencing. ONT had a higher taxonomic resolution at the genus level (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.