ArticlemSystems2025
The inconsistent pathogenesis of endometriosis and adenomyosis: insights from endometrial metabolome and microbiome.
Article in mSystems, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Microbiome and chronic pelvic pain in women: a mini-review.Human reproduction (Oxford, England) · 2026Review
- Characteristics of Placental Bacterial DNA Communities in Pregnant Women with Gestational Diabetes Mellitus and Association with Early Neonatal Gut Microbiota and Short-Term Perinatal Outcomes.Polish journal of microbiology · 2026Article
- Translational Assessment of Omics Approaches in Endometriosis: Bridging Molecular Discovery with Clinical Utility.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Sphingomonas paucimobilis-Driven Epithelial-Endothelial Transition in Adenomyosis Pathogenesis.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- Dietary Fiber in Endometriosis: Mechanisms, Evidence, and Potential Clinical Benefits-Up-to-Date Review.Nutrients · 2026Review
- A Dive into the Invisible: The Vaginal and Endometrial Microbiota in Gynecologic and Obstetric Disorders: A Narrative Review.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Intestinal microbiota alteration in women with adenomyosis and clinical characteristics correlation.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Article
- Bioinformatic analysis and validation of candidate genes in the eutopic endometrium reveal differential expressions in diffuse adenomyosis, endometrioma, and their co-existence.European journal of medical research · 2025Article
- Endometrial Microbiome and Reproductive Receptivity: Diverse Perspectives.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Reproductive tract microbiota dysbiosis in ovarian endometrioma and adenomyosis: multi-site 16S rRNA profiling and functional impact of key bacterial species on human endometrial stromal cells.BMC microbiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Endometriosis (EM) and adenomyosis (AM) are interrelated gynecological disorders characterized by the aberrant presence of endometrial tissue and are frequently linked with chronic pelvic pain and infertility, yet their pathogenetic mechanisms remain largely unclear. In this cross-sectional study, we analyzed endometrial samples from 244 participants, split into 91 EM patients, 56 AM patients, and 97 healthy controls (HC). We conducted untargeted liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) and 5R 16S rRNA sequencing to examine endometrial metabolome and microbiome profiles. Additionally, we integrated transcriptomic analysis using nine transcriptomic data sets to investigate the biological basis of these conditions. Metabolomic profiling and 16S rRNA sequencing revealed distinct metabolic and microbial signatures. Specific pathways, including linoleic acid and glycerophospholipid metabolism, show significant alterations in both conditions. Notably, four metabolites, including phosphatidylcholine 40:8 [PC(40:8)], exhibited marked changes in both EM and AM, suggesting shared pathological features. Furthermore, taxonomic analysis identified unique bacterial species associated with each condition, particularly those belonging to the phylum Proteobacteria, which correlated with altered metabolic signatures. Machine learning models demonstrated high predictive accuracy for differentiating between AM, EM, and HC based on metabolic and microbial signatures. Integrative analysis with transcriptomic data highlighted distinct pathways related to immune response and signaling transduction for each condition. Our study provides fresh insights into the pathogenesis of AM and EM through a multi-omic approach, suggesting potential inconsistencies in the underlying pathogenetic mechanisms. IMPORTANCE: Existing research highlighted a connection between endometriosis (EM) and adenomyosis (AM), underscoring their overlapping symptoms and potential shared pathophysiological mechanisms. Although the role of microbiota in inflammatory conditions has been acknowledged, comprehensive investigations into the endometrial microbiota in cases of EM and AM have been limited. Previous studies identified distinct microbial communities associated with these conditions; however, they were constrained by small sample sizes and a lack of integrated analyses of microbiota and metabolomics. Furthermore, the ongoing debate over whether EM and AM should be classified as separate diseases or related phenotypes emphasizes the necessity for further exploration of their molecular interactions. Our study uncovers distinct microbial and metabolic signatures associated with each condition, revealing both shared and unique pathways that may contribute to their pathogenesis. Furthermore, the integration of transcriptomic data offers valuable insights into the complex interactions underlying these disorders.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.