ReviewThe international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery : MRCAS2025
Legal Implication in Utilizing Automated Robots: A Written Informed Consent Form Proposal.
Review in The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery : MRCAS, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRobotic systems enhance physicians' capabilities by replicating hand movements in real-time, ensuring precise control and a quick return to conventional procedures if patient safety is compromised. Physicians performing robot-assisted procedures bear ultimate responsibility, sharing potential liability with manufacturers for malfunctions.
methodsThis study, conducted by a transdisciplinary team of interventional radiologists and a legal expert, evaluates the integration of robotic systems in interventional radiology through a comprehensive literature review, addressing potential legal contingencies.
resultsThis paper aims to define liability in this context and examines how workflows and doctor-patient relationships might be reshaped: patients must be informed about treatment options, including details about robot-assisted procedures and associated risks.
conclusionsThese systems could significantly impact interventional radiology practice. A dedicated informed consent process is necessary to ensure clear communication and protect the decision-making process and patient-centred care; thereby, an informed consent is proposed to comprehensively address these needs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.