ArticleJournal of clinical laboratory analysis2025
Development of a Multiplexed qPCR Kit for the Detection of Bloodstream Infection.
Article in Journal of clinical laboratory analysis, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundBloodstream infection (BSI) is associated with high morbidity and mortality worldwide. Currently, BSI diagnosis relies on a time-consuming blood culture method, which usually takes 2 or more days to identify the causative pathogens. Cell-free DNA (cfDNA) refers to those small nucleic acid fragments residing in plasma and other body fluids, which have been used to detect cancer, organ transplantation injury, and pathogenic infections. A new multiplexed fluorescent quantitative PCR kit aiming at plasma microbial cfDNA was developed in this study. The kit contains multiple panels, and each panel covers multiple pathogens, including E. coli, K. pneumoniae, A. baumannii, H. influenzae, P. aeruginosa, E. faecalis, E. faecium, S. aureus, and S. epidermidis.
methodsPCR primers and probes were designed based on effective bacterial sequence segments, which were obtained from the analysis of next-generation sequencing results of plasma samples of patients with bloodstream infections. Bioinformatics analyses and experimental evidence were used to test the conservativeness and specificity of the primers and probes. The lower detection limit of the kit was determined under optimal reaction conditions. Clinical samples were used to test the accuracy of the kit's detection.
resultsThe lower detection limit of the kit has reached ≤ 12 copies per reaction. Clinical samples testing results showed a 90.48% consistency between the kit and blood culture.
conclusionThe kit provides a rapid, accurate, and reliable method for diagnosing bloodstream infections. This can quickly provide an etiological basis for clinical diagnosis and further treatment, potentially improving patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.