Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40260954›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical laboratory analysis2025

Development of a Multiplexed qPCR Kit for the Detection of Bloodstream Infection.

Kai Niu, Yiping Wang, Zhiyu Pang, Miaomiao Niu, Zhitong Sun, Jennie Luo, Chaoqun Xia, Yanqiao Qian, Zhi Xu, Yong Luo and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical laboratory analysis, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Kai NiuCenter for Basic and Translational Research, the 2nd Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
Yiping WangThe Clinical Laboratory Department of the Affiliated People's Hospital of Ningbo University, Ningbo, China.
Zhiyu PangNingbo Health Gene Technologies co., ltd., Ningbo, China.
Miaomiao NiuNingbo Health Gene Technologies co., ltd., Ningbo, China.
Zhitong SunNingbo Health Gene Technologies co., ltd., Ningbo, China.
Jennie LuoThe Clinical Laboratory Department of the Affiliated People's Hospital of Ningbo University, Ningbo, China.
Chaoqun XiaThe Clinical Laboratory Department of the Affiliated People's Hospital of Ningbo University, Ningbo, China.
Yanqiao QianNingbo Health Gene Technologies co., ltd., Ningbo, China.
Zhi XuNingbo Health Gene Technologies co., ltd., Ningbo, China.
Yong LuoNingbo Health Gene Technologies co., ltd., Ningbo, China.
Yong WuNingbo Health Gene Technologies co., ltd., Ningbo, China.
Dijun ZhangNingbo Health Gene Technologies co., ltd., Ningbo, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3417-9849
Jiang CaoCenter for Basic and Translational Research, the 2nd Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9542-5279

Funding

Ningbo Science and Technology Innovation 2025 Major Special Project 2019B10056
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBloodstream infection (BSI) is associated with high morbidity and mortality worldwide. Currently, BSI diagnosis relies on a time-consuming blood culture method, which usually takes 2 or more days to identify the causative pathogens. Cell-free DNA (cfDNA) refers to those small nucleic acid fragments residing in plasma and other body fluids, which have been used to detect cancer, organ transplantation injury, and pathogenic infections. A new multiplexed fluorescent quantitative PCR kit aiming at plasma microbial cfDNA was developed in this study. The kit contains multiple panels, and each panel covers multiple pathogens, including E. coli, K. pneumoniae, A. baumannii, H. influenzae, P. aeruginosa, E. faecalis, E. faecium, S. aureus, and S. epidermidis.

methodsPCR primers and probes were designed based on effective bacterial sequence segments, which were obtained from the analysis of next-generation sequencing results of plasma samples of patients with bloodstream infections. Bioinformatics analyses and experimental evidence were used to test the conservativeness and specificity of the primers and probes. The lower detection limit of the kit was determined under optimal reaction conditions. Clinical samples were used to test the accuracy of the kit's detection.

resultsThe lower detection limit of the kit has reached ≤ 12 copies per reaction. Clinical samples testing results showed a 90.48% consistency between the kit and blood culture.

conclusionThe kit provides a rapid, accurate, and reliable method for diagnosing bloodstream infections. This can quickly provide an etiological basis for clinical diagnosis and further treatment, potentially improving patient outcomes.

Indexed as

BacteremiaMultiplex Polymerase Chain ReactionReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionSepsisBacteriaCell-Free Nucleic AcidsDNA, BacterialHumansLimit of DetectionSensitivity and SpecificityCell-Free Nucleic AcidsDNA, Bacterialbioinformaticsbloodstream infectioncell‐free DNAdetectionmultiplexed PCR

Identifiers

PMID40260954
PMCPMC12089792

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.