ArticleHematological oncology2025
Impact of Age on Biology, Presentation and Outcomes in Marginal Zone Lymphoma: Results From a Multicenter Cohort Study.
Article in Hematological oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Given the paucity of age-specific data about biology, presentation, and treatment outcomes in adults with MZL, we sought to evaluate differences between younger (≤ 70 years) and older (> 70 years) patients with MZL in a large retrospective cohort treated in the contemporary era (2010 onwards). The primary objective was progression-free survival (PFS), while secondary objectives included the evaluation of overall survival (OS) and the cumulative incidence of transformation between the 2 groups. A total of 598 patients were included in the analysis and among these 32% were > 70 years of age. There were no age-based differences in the prevalence of NMZL, SMZL, and EMZL. Older patients had a higher incidence of adverse prognostic features at diagnosis such as worse performance status, advanced stage disease, and bone marrow involvement, yet were more likely to be treated with single-agent rituximab than chemoimmunotherapy. Age > 70 years was associated with inferior PFS and OS after controlling for clinically relevant risk factors and accounting for differences in first-line treatment. Receipt of rituximab monotherapy was associated with significantly inferior PFS overall, however, the type of first-line therapy did not impact OS in any group. Our data suggests that despite the development of new drugs for MZL, age remains an independent predictor of inferior outcomes. Investigation of targeted therapy combinations in the first-line setting may yield the required balance of efficacy and toxicity in older adults with MZL.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.