Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40260885›Full record

ReviewInternal medicine journal2025

The 'nephrotoxins' were stopped: what is in a name and its impact on kidney and cardiac health?

Catherine Mao, Bobby Chacko

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Internal medicine journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Catherine MaoNephrology and Transplantation Unit, John Hunter Hospital, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia.
Bobby ChackoNephrology and Transplantation Unit, John Hunter Hospital, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-0292-5512

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The term 'nephrotoxin' is often imprecisely applied to medications that are not inherently toxic to the kidneys, including renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors, sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors, diuretics and metformin. These drugs are frequently included in 'sick day rules' and may be prematurely discontinued during acute illness or acute kidney injury (AKI). However, these medications offer substantial benefits, such as preserving cardiac and kidney function and reducing mortality. Discontinuing them without appropriate clinical judgement can lead to unintended harm. Clinicians should adopt a patient-specific, evidence-based approach when managing medications in AKI and chronic kidney disease, informed by pharmacology and individualised risk assessment. Patients may overinterpret advice to 'stop nephrotoxic medications' as a permanent measure, leading to hesitation in restarting necessary treatments. This misconception can create barriers to optimal care and complicate decision-making, as patients may prioritise avoiding perceived harm over addressing their full medical needs. This manuscript emphasises the need for nuanced and informed decision-making in the management of medications in kidney-related conditions.

Indexed as

Acute Kidney InjuryKidneyRenal Insufficiency, ChronicDiureticsHumansMetforminSodium-Glucose Transporter 2 InhibitorsDiureticsMetforminSodium-Glucose Transporter 2 Inhibitorsdiureticmetforminnephrotoxinrenin‐angiotensin aldosterone system inhibitorsick day rulesodium glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor

Identifiers

PMID40260885
PMCPMC12155080

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.