ArticleJournal of computational chemistry2025
Assessment of Free Energies From Electrostatic Embedding Density Functional Tight Binding-Based/Molecular Mechanics in Periodic Boundary Conditions.
Article in Journal of computational chemistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Electrostatic embedding quantum mechanics/molecular mechanics (QM/MM) methods in periodic boundary conditions (PBC) can successfully describe the condensed phase reactivity of a fragment treated at the QM level with an atomistic description of an electrostatic environment treated at the MM level. The computational cost of ab initio QM methods limits the phase space sampling, thus affecting statistical quantities like free energies. Here, we describe the implementation of a PBC-adapted QM/MM model based on the semi-empirical density-functional based tight-binding (DFTB) method within the GAMESS-US quantum package interfaced with Tinker. Further, we take advantage of the free energy methods provided by a newly developed interface with the PLUMED plugin. The versatility of the implementation is illustrated by the prediction of the free energy profile for three different families of reactions in solution. Overall, using the DFTB/MM, it has been possible to obtain results that are at least in a qualitatively agreement with respect to the experimental data or high-level ab initio simulations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.