Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40260830›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2025

Acupuncture for procedural pain in newborn infants.

Rita Cabano, Haneen Al-Abdallat, Rawan Hamamreh, Greg Soll, Ju Lee Oei, Georg M Schmölzer, Matteo Bruschettini

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Acupuncture for the treatment of infantile colic.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Rita CabanoNeonatal Intensive Care Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy.
Haneen Al-AbdallatSchool of Medicine, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan.
Rawan HamamrehFaculty of Medicine, Hashemite University, Zarqa, Jordan.
Greg SollSeattle Institute of East Asian Medicine, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Ju Lee OeiDepartment of Newborn Care, Royal Hospital for Women, Randwick, Australia.
Georg M SchmölzerDivision of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
Matteo BruschettiniPaediatrics, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

rationaleProcedural pain management in newborns, particularly those in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs), presents challenges due to limited safe and effective options. Acupuncture, a Traditional Chinese Medicine practice, has emerged as a potential alternative for pain relief in this population.

objectivesTo assess the benefits and harms of acupuncture in newborn infants undergoing painful procedures. SEARCH

methodsWe searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), PubMed, Embase, and clinical trial registries up to August 2023. We checked the references of included studies and related systematic reviews. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: We included parallel and cross-over randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing acupuncture with no treatment or sham treatment; any non-pharmacological treatment; any pharmacological treatment; or one type of acupuncture compared to another type of acupuncture. OUTCOMES: Our outcomes were: pain scores; harms; parental, family, and caregiver satisfaction with the intervention; use of additional pharmacological intervention for pain relief; episodes of bradycardia/apnea/desaturation; neonatal mortality; mortality during initial hospitalization; intraventricular hemorrhage; late-onset sepsis; duration of hospital stay; major neurodevelopmental disability. RISK OF BIAS: We used Cochrane's RoB 1 tool for RCTs. SYNTHESIS

methodsWe conducted meta-analyses using fixed-effect models to calculate risk ratios (RR) and risk differences (RD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for dichotomous outcomes, and mean difference (MD) or standardized mean difference (SMD, when combining different pain scales) and standard deviation for continuous outcomes. We summarized the certainty of evidence according to the GRADE approach. INCLUDED STUDIES: We included 11 RCTs enrolling 852 infants. Five studies compared acupuncture to no treatment or sham treatment; four studies to non-pharmacological treatment (oral sucrose or glucose); and two studies compared acupuncture to other types of Traditional Chinese Medicine treatments, which we refer to as 'type B acupuncture,' such as foot massage or reflexology. No studies compared acupuncture to any pharmacological treatment. We identified four ongoing studies. SYNTHESIS OF

resultsWe have listed outcomes reported in at least one study. Acupuncture compared to no treatment or sham treatment Acupuncture may reduce pain assessed during the procedure with any validated scale compared to no intervention (SMD -0.56, 95% CI -0.75 to -0.37; 7 studies, 471 infants; low-certainty evidence). It may result in little to no difference in any harms compared to no intervention (RR 0.35, 95% CI 0.01 to 8.31; 2 studies, 138 infants; low-certainty evidence). Acupuncture compared to any non-pharmacological treatment The evidence is very uncertain about the effect of acupuncture on pain assessed with a validated scale during the procedure compared to non-pharmacological intervention (SMD 0.29, 95% CI 0.04 to 0.54; 4 studies, 267 infants; very low-certainty evidence). Acupuncture may result in little to no difference in any harms compared to non-pharmacological treatment (RR not estimable, RD 0.00, 95% CI -0.03 to 0.03; 3 studies, 247 infants; low-certainty evidence). Acupuncture type A (e.g. penetration of the skin with a needle) compared to acupuncture type B (e.g. foot massage or reflexology) The evidence is very uncertain about the effect of acupressure on pain assessed with any validated scale during the procedure compared to foot massage (SMD 0.05, 95% CI -0.26 to 0.36; 2 studies, 163 infants; very low-certainty evidence). AUTHORS'

conclusionsAcupuncture may reduce pain assessed with different scales during the procedure, with little to no difference in any harms, when compared to no intervention. The evidence is very uncertain about the effect of acupuncture on pain assessed with different scales during the procedure when compared to any non-pharmacological treatment; acupuncture may result in little to no difference in any harms. The evidence is very uncertain about the effect of acupressure on pain assessed during the procedure when compared to foot massage or reflexology.

fundingThis Cochrane review had no dedicated funding. REGISTRATION: Protocol (2023): doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD015894.

Indexed as

Acupuncture TherapyPain ManagementProcedural PainBiasBradycardiaHumansInfant, NewbornIntensive Care Units, NeonatalLength of StayPain MeasurementRandomized Controlled Trials as Topic

Identifiers

PMID40260830
PMCPMC12042178

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.